Authorship in Early Modern Jurisprudence: Paul Voet (1619-1667) on auctor and editor.
Paul Voet (1619-1669), law professor at the University of Utrecht, opened his most famous work, published in 1657, with an unusual discussion of the five different types of auctores of juridical books (juris libri)--a precious source for the history of authorship in the jurisprudence and in the earl...
| Publicado en: | Quaerendo Vol. 47; no. 3/4; pp. 252 - 278 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2017
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=126895244&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 126895244 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00149527 C4O jtl: Quaerendo issn: 00149527 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2017 vid: 47 iid: 3/4 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 126895244 10.1163/15700690-12341385 ppf: 252 ppct: 26 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.6MB tig: atl: Authorship in Early Modern Jurisprudence: Paul Voet (1619-1667) on auctor and editor. aug: au: Varela, Laura Beck affil: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain su: Authorship History of the book Voet, Paulus, 1619-1677 Legal history History of canon law Decretum Gratiani Seventeenth century sug: subj: Authorship History of the book Voet, Paulus, 1619-1677 Legal history History of canon law Decretum Gratiani Seventeenth century keyword: book history canon law in the Dutch Republic Gratian's Decretum history of authorship history of law legal interpretation Paul Voet ab: Paul Voet (1619-1669), law professor at the University of Utrecht, opened his most famous work, published in 1657, with an unusual discussion of the five different types of auctores of juridical books (juris libri)--a precious source for the history of authorship in the jurisprudence and in the early modern respublica litteraria in general. This essay discusses the key concepts for his understanding of auctor and auctoritas in the field of jurisprudence, as well as the motivations for this uncommon inquiry into the notion of authorship. Besides his personal reasons (the rumors about the illegitimate authorship of some of his works), the detailed taxonomy of legal auctores also helped him to build a cogent argument against the validity of canon law in the United Provinces. His aim was to redesign the history of legal tradition and to dispute the authority of certain canon law sources, such as Gratian's Decretum. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Quaerendo is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Quaerendo holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2017 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|