Accuracy of acute burns diagnosis made using smartphones and tablets: a questionnaire-based study among medical experts.

Background: Remote assistance for burns by medical experts can support nurses and general physicians in emergency care with diagnostic and management advice. Previous studies indicate a high diagnostic accuracy based on images viewed on a computer screen, but whether image-based analysis by experts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BMC Emergency Medicine Vol. 17; pp. 1 - 11
Autores principales: Blom, Lisa, Boissin, Constance, Allorto, Nikki, Wallis, Lee, Hasselberg, Marie, Laflamme, Lucie
Formato: forms research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: BioMed Central 12/13/2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=127009339&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 127009339
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1471227X
        1CHK
      jtl: BMC Emergency Medicine
      issn: 1471227X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 12/13/2017
      vid: 17
      pid: 24147
      pub: BioMed Central
    artinfo:
      ui:
        127009339
        127009339
        NLM29237400
        127009339
        10.1186/s12873-017-0151-4
        NLM29237400
        127009339
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Accuracy of acute burns diagnosis made using smartphones and tablets: a questionnaire-based study among medical experts.
      aug:
        au:
          Blom, Lisa
          Boissin, Constance
          Allorto, Nikki
          Wallis, Lee
          Hasselberg, Marie
          Laflamme, Lucie
        affil: Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
      sug:
        subj:
          Telemedicine Methods
          Computers, Hand-Held
          Burns Diagnosis
          Female
          Adolescence
          Age Factors
          Reproducibility of Results
          Child, Preschool
          Infant, Newborn
          Burns Pathology
          Male
          Young Adult
          Observer Bias
          Child
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Photography
          Infant
          Human
          Funding Source
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Child: 6-12 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: Remote assistance for burns by medical experts can support nurses and general physicians in emergency care with diagnostic and management advice. Previous studies indicate a high diagnostic accuracy based on images viewed on a computer screen, but whether image-based analysis by experts using handheld devices is accurate remains to be determined.Method: A review of patient data from eight emergency centres in the Western Cape, South Africa, revealed 10 typical cases of burns commonly seen in children and adults. A web-based questionnaire was created with 51 images of burns representing those cases. Burns specialists from two countries (South Africa and Sweden (n = 8 and 7 respectively)) and emergency medicine specialists from South Africa (n = 11) were contacted by email and asked to assess each burn's total body surface area (TBSA) and depth using a smartphone or tablet. The accuracy and inter-rater reliability of the assessments were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), both for all cases aggregated and for paediatric and adult burn cases separately. Eight participants repeated the questionnaire on a computer and intra-rater reliability was calculated.Results: The assessments of TBSA are of high accuracy all specialists aggregated (ICC = 0.82 overall and 0.81 for both child and adult cases separately) and remain high for all three participant groups separately. The burn depth assessments have low accuracy all specialists aggregated, with ICCs of 0.53 overall, 0.61 for child and 0.46 for adult cases. The most accurate assessments of depth are among South African burns specialists (reaching acceptable for child cases); the other two groups' ICCs are low in all instances. Computer-based assessments were similar to those made on handheld devices.Conclusion: As was the case for computer-based studies, burns images viewed on handheld devices may be a suitable means of seeking expert advice even with limited additional information when it comes to burn size but less so in the case of burn depth. Familiarity with the type of cases presented could facilitate image-based diagnosis of depth.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        forms
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N