A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.

Background: The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) has emerged as an improved metric for use by medical physicists and radiologists for estimating individual patient dose. Several methods of calculating SSDE have been described, ranging from patient thickness or attenuation-based (automated and manu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pediatric Radiology Vol. 48; no. 1; pp. 56 - 66
Autores principales: Parikh, Roshni A., Wien, Michael A., Novak, Ronald D., Jordan, David W., Klahr, Paul, Soriano, Stephanie, Ciancibello, Leslie, Berlin, Sheila C.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jan2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=127041623&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 127041623
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03010449
        O03
      jtl: Pediatric Radiology
      issn: 03010449
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2018
      vid: 48
      iid: 1
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        127041623
        127041623
        144154472
        NLM28951948
        127041623
        10.1007/s00247-017-3986-7
        NLM28951948
        127041623
      ppf: 56
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: A comparison study of size-specific dose estimate calculation methods.
      aug:
        au:
          Parikh, Roshni A.
          Wien, Michael A.
          Novak, Ronald D.
          Jordan, David W.
          Klahr, Paul
          Soriano, Stephanie
          Ciancibello, Leslie
          Berlin, Sheila C.
        affil: Department of Radiology, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave., 44106, Cleveland, OH, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          Body Weight
          Algorithms
          Body Size
          Radiation Dosage
          Human
          Child
          Young Adult
          Child, Preschool
          Relative Risk
          Infant
          Retrospective Design
          Male
          Female
          Adolescence
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Child: 6-12 years
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background: The size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) has emerged as an improved metric for use by medical physicists and radiologists for estimating individual patient dose. Several methods of calculating SSDE have been described, ranging from patient thickness or attenuation-based (automated and manual) measurements to weight-based techniques.Objective: To compare the accuracy of thickness vs. weight measurement of body size to allow for the calculation of the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) in pediatric body CT.Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified 109 pediatric body CT examinations for SSDE calculation. We examined two automated methods measuring a series of level-specific diameters of the patient's body: method A used the effective diameter and method B used the water-equivalent diameter. Two manual methods measured patient diameter at two predetermined levels: the superior endplate of L2, where body width is typically most thin, and the superior femoral head or iliac crest (for scans that did not include the pelvis), where body width is typically most thick; method C averaged lateral measurements at these two levels from the CT projection scan, and method D averaged lateral and anteroposterior measurements at the same two levels from the axial CT images. Finally, we used body weight to characterize patient size, method E, and compared this with the various other measurement methods. Methods were compared across the entire population as well as by subgroup based on body width.Results: Concordance correlation (ρc) between each of the SSDE calculation methods (methods A-E) was greater than 0.92 across the entire population, although the range was wider when analyzed by subgroup (0.42-0.99). When we compared each SSDE measurement method with CTDIvol, there was poor correlation, ρc<0.77, with percentage differences between 20.8% and 51.0%.Conclusion: Automated computer algorithms are accurate and efficient in the calculation of SSDE. Manual methods based on patient thickness provide acceptable dose estimates for pediatric patients <30 cm in body width. Body weight provides a quick and practical method to identify conversion factors that can be used to estimate SSDE with reasonable accuracy in pediatric patients with body width ≥20 cm.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N