The Impact of “Possible Patients” on Phenotyping Algorithms: Electronic Phenotype Algorithms Can Only Be Reproduced by Sharing Detailed Annotation Criteria...16th World Congress of Medical and Health Informatics: Precision Healthcare Through Informatics (MedInfo2017 Hangzhou China August 21-25 2017

Phenotyping is an automated technique for identifying patients diagnosed with a particular disease based on electronic health records (EHRs). To evaluate phenotyping algorithms, which should be reproducible, the annotation of EHRs as a gold standard is critical. However, we have found that the diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Studies in Health Technology & Informatics Vol. 245; pp. 432 - 437
Autores principales: Rina Kagawa, Yoshimasa Kawazoe, Emiko Shinohara, Takeshi Imai, Kazuhiko Ohe
Formato: proceedings research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:Phenotyping is an automated technique for identifying patients diagnosed with a particular disease based on electronic health records (EHRs). To evaluate phenotyping algorithms, which should be reproducible, the annotation of EHRs as a gold standard is critical. However, we have found that the different types of EHRs cannot be definitively annotated into CASEs or CONTROLs. The influence of such “possible patients” on phenotyping algorithms is unknown. To assess these issues, for four chronic diseases, we annotated EHRs by using information not directly referring to the diseases and developed two types of phenotyping algorithms for each disease. We confirmed that each disease included different types of possible patients. The performance of phenotyping algorithms differed depending on whether possible patients were considered as CASEs, and this was independent of the type of algorithms. Our results indicate that researchers must share annotation criteria for classifying the possible patients to reproduce phenotyping algorithms.