Persian translation and validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale.

Background: Patient-reported questionnaires provide important tools that can be utilized for the assessment of treatment efficacy in clinic and research. This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Persian (BPFSp).Methods: In this cross-sec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physiotherapy Theory & Practice Vol. 34; no. 3; pp. 223 - 231
Autores principales: Nakhostin Ansari, Noureddin, Naghdi, Soofia, Habibzadeh, Fatemeh, Salsabili, Nasser, Ebadi, Safoora
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=127095009&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 127095009
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09593985
        BCJ
      jtl: Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
      issn: 09593985
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2018
      vid: 34
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        127095009
        127095009
        127095009
        10.1080/09593985.2017.1390804
        127095009
      ppf: 223
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Persian translation and validation of the Back Pain Functional Scale.
      aug:
        au:
          Nakhostin Ansari, Noureddin
          Naghdi, Soofia
          Habibzadeh, Fatemeh
          Salsabili, Nasser
          Ebadi, Safoora
        affil: Department of Physiotherapy, School of Rehabilitation, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
      sug:
        subj:
          Back Pain Iran
          Functional Assessment Methods
          Instrument Validation Iran
          Human
          Validation Studies
          Iran
          Scales
          Cross Sectional Studies
          Prospective Studies
          Low Back Pain
          Psychometrics
          Test-Retest Reliability
          Coefficient alpha
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Construct Validity
          Criterion-Related Validity
          Factor Analysis
          Reliability and Validity
          Pilot Studies
          Content Validity
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Questionnaires
          Self Report
          Data Analysis Software
          Internal Validity
          Analysis of Variance
          Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Correlation Coefficient
          Discriminant Validity
          T-Tests
          Translations
          Female
          Male
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: Patient-reported questionnaires provide important tools that can be utilized for the assessment of treatment efficacy in clinic and research. This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and validate the Back Pain Functional Scale into Persian (BPFSp).Methods: In this cross-sectional and prospective cohort of adult patients with low back pain (LBP), the translation and adaptation was performed according to standardized guidelines and pretested (n = 30). Psychometric testing was conducted with 100 patients with LBP and 50 healthy subjects. Fifty patients with LBP recompleted the BPFSp at least 7 days later for test–retest reliability.Results: The Persian adapted version of the BPFS was produced and validated. No floor and ceiling effects were revealed. The Cronbach’α coefficient for internal consistency was 0.895. The test–retest reliability was excellent (ICCagreement = 0.88, CI 95%: 0.80–0.93). The standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change were 9.9% and 27.5%, respectively. Construct convergent validity was demonstrated with the Persian Functional Rating Index (r = −0.77). Criterion validity was established with the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (r = −0.67). Total BPFSp scores discriminated between patients with LBP and healthy subjects. Factor structure showed two latent factors explaining a total variance of 60.1%.Conclusion: The BPFSp presented excellent reliability and validity for assessing the functional status in Persian speaking patients with LBP.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N