WORKING-CLASS AUTHORITARIANISM: A RE-EVALUATION.
This article focuses on the relation between "authoritarianism" and social class. The relation between authoritarianism and social class remains obscure. In some early formulations, the "authoritarian personality" was conceived chiefly in connection with middle-class support for fascist movements. S...
| Publicado en: | American Sociological Review Vol. 30; no. 1; pp. 103 - 110 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Feb65
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=12766849&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 12766849 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00031224 ASC jtl: American Sociological Review issn: 00031224 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb65 vid: 30 iid: 1 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. artinfo: ui: 12766849 10.2307/2091777 ppf: 103 ppct: 7 formats: tig: atl: WORKING-CLASS AUTHORITARIANISM: A RE-EVALUATION. aug: au: Lipsitz, Lewis affil: University of North Carolina. su: Authoritarian personality Social classes Middle class Political science Working class Families sug: subj: Authoritarian personality Social classes Middle class Political science Working class Families ab: This article focuses on the relation between "authoritarianism" and social class. The relation between authoritarianism and social class remains obscure. In some early formulations, the "authoritarian personality" was conceived chiefly in connection with middle-class support for fascist movements. Some recent research bias supported the asserted connection between authoritarianism and membership in the middle-class. The differences between working and middle-class authoritarian responses vary considerably, depending on the kind of question asked. Working-class men appear markedly more authoritarian on questions specifically designed to tap the psychological syndrome of authoritarianism. They are less sharply differentiated from middle-class respondents on questions that deal more directly with political and social issues. Perhaps discussion of authoritarianism in "class" terms should give way to more specific analyses, focusing more directly on the variables thought to influence the development of authoritarianism, such as economic and status insecurity, work dissatisfaction, lack of education, autocratic family structure and the like. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1965 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|