THE CONSISTENCY OF SUBJECT BEHAVIOR AND THE RELIABILITY OF SCORING IN INTERACTION PROCESS ANALYSTS.

Previously conducted research has indicated that the "between observer reliability, for highly skilled observers, by session, by scoring category for initiated behavior is acceptably high. For the self-self observer reliability to be lower, it would require essentially, that the non-systematic error...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Sociological Review Vol. 18; no. 5; pp. 566 - 570
Autores principales: Borgatta, Edgar F., Bales, Robert F.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Oct53
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=12786517&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 12786517
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00031224
        ASC
      jtl: American Sociological Review
      issn: 00031224
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct53
      vid: 18
      iid: 5
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        12786517
        10.2307/2087443
      ppf: 566
      ppct: 4
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: THE CONSISTENCY OF SUBJECT BEHAVIOR AND THE RELIABILITY OF SCORING IN INTERACTION PROCESS ANALYSTS.
      aug:
        au:
          Borgatta, Edgar F.
          Bales, Robert F.
        affil: Laboratory of Social Relations, Harvard University
      su:
        Interaction (Philosophy)
        Reliability (Personality trait)
        Evidence
        Reasoning
        Hypothesis
        Statistical correlation
      sug:
        subj:
          Interaction (Philosophy)
          Reliability (Personality trait)
          Evidence
          Reasoning
          Hypothesis
          Statistical correlation
      ab: Previously conducted research has indicated that the "between observer reliability, for highly skilled observers, by session, by scoring category for initiated behavior is acceptably high. For the self-self observer reliability to be lower, it would require essentially, that the non-systematic errors of two observers consistently be in the same direction, which is relatively unlikely. Adequate tests of self-self observer reliabilities will have to wait until series of standardized materials, such as films, are produced for scoring and then rescoring (test-retest). It would appear, thus, that researchers may plan to utilize formal scoring techniques such as Bales' Interaction Process Analysis with a reasonable confidence that training will produce observers who are reliable, or consistently arbitrary, in their scoring. Data were collected by time unit, permitting collation under several plans. The "actual behavior" of each subject consisted of four units of six minutes each for each of four sessions. The stability of subjects was examined by two plans. The plan one correlations are ordinarily lower than the plan two correlations. This may be interpreted as evidence for the hypothesis that a person will be more consistent, given the same amount of time, when interacting with the same individuals than when interacting with different individuals.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 1953
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N