Comparison of Two Toric IOLs with Different Haptic Design: Optical Quality after 1 Year.

<italic>Background.</italic> The purpose of this prospective, randomised study was to interocularly compare the visual performance after implantation of two different toric IOLs with different haptic design. <italic>Methods.</italic> 59 subjects with corneal astigmatism greater than 1.25 diopter (D)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Ophthalmology pp. 1 - 8
Main Authors: Miháltz, Kata, Lasta, Michael, Burgmüller, Michael, Vécsei-Marlovits, Pia Veronika, Weingessel, Birgit
Format: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2/11/2018
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=127928644&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 127928644
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        2090004X
        9038
      jtl: Journal of Ophthalmology
      issn: 2090004X
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2/11/2018
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        127928644
        127928644
        127928644
        10.1155/2018/4064369
        127928644
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparison of Two Toric IOLs with Different Haptic Design: Optical Quality after 1 Year.
      aug:
        au:
          Miháltz, Kata
          Lasta, Michael
          Burgmüller, Michael
          Vécsei-Marlovits, Pia Veronika
          Weingessel, Birgit
        affil: Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Hietzing, Vienna, Austria
      sug:
        subj:
          Lenses, Intraocular
          Postoperative Period
          Visual Acuity
          Prosthesis Design
          Human
          Prospective Studies
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Astigmatism
          Outcome Assessment
          Tomography, Optical Coherence Methods
          Diagnosis, Eye
      ab: <italic>Background.</italic> The purpose of this prospective, randomised study was to interocularly compare the visual performance after implantation of two different toric IOLs with different haptic design. <italic>Methods.</italic> 59 subjects with corneal astigmatism greater than 1.25 diopter (D) were implanted with an AT TORBI 709M IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) in one eye and with a Tecnis toric aspheric IOL (Abbot Medical Optics) in the other eye. Observation procedure was performed 12 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), manifest refraction, IOL rotation, and IOL position. <italic>Results.</italic> Mean UCDVA was 0.04 ± 0.14 logMAR for AT TORBI eyes and 0.06 ± 0.15 logMAR for Tecnis eyes (p=0.3). The postoperative spherical equivalent values were significantly lower in the AT TORBI group. Mean toric IOL axis rotation was 3.0 ± 2.26 degrees for AT TORBI eyes and 3.27 ± 2.37 for Tecnis eyes (p=0.5). The mean vertical IOL tilt and vertical decentration values measured with the Visante OCT were significantly larger in the AT TORBI group (p<0.05). <italic>Conclusions.</italic> Both the Tecnis and the AT TORBI toric IOLs successfully reduced ocular astigmatism. Emmetropia could be better achieved with the AT TORBI IOL, whereas the Tecnis showed better positional stability. This trial is registered with ICMJE <ext-link>NCT03371576</ext-link>.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N