THE MYSTERIANISM OF OWEN FLANAGAN'S NORMATIVE MIND SCIENCE.

Abstract: This article critically analyzes Owen Flanagan's physicalism and attempt at deriving ethical normativity from current neuroscience. It is argued that neurophysicalism, despite Flanagan's harsh critique of “the new mysterians,” entails a form of mysterianism and that it fails to appropriate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science Vol. 53; no. 1; pp. 29 - 49
Autor principal: Leidenhag, Mikael
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Open Library of Humanities Mar2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=127969213&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 127969213
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        05912385
        ZYG
      jtl: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science
      issn: 05912385
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2018
      vid: 53
      iid: 1
      pid: 15576
      pub: Open Library of Humanities
    artinfo:
      ui:
        127969213
        10.1111/zygo.12381
      ppf: 29
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 102KB
      tig:
        atl: THE MYSTERIANISM OF OWEN FLANAGAN'S NORMATIVE MIND SCIENCE.
      aug:
        au: Leidenhag, Mikael
      su:
        Flanagan, Owen
        Consciousness
        Eudaimonism
        Neurosciences
        Materialism
      sug:
        subj:
          Flanagan, Owen
          Consciousness
          Eudaimonism
          Neurosciences
          Materialism
      keyword:
        consciousness
        eudaimonia
        hard problem of consciousness
        mysterianism
        neurophysicalism
        Owen Flanagan
      ab: Abstract: This article critically analyzes Owen Flanagan's physicalism and attempt at deriving ethical normativity from current neuroscience. It is argued that neurophysicalism, despite Flanagan's harsh critique of “the new mysterians,” entails a form of mysterianism and that it fails to appropriately ground human mentality within physicalism. Flanagan seeks to bring spirituality and a physicalist ontology together by showing how it is possible to derive an account of the good life from science. This attempt is critiqued and it is shown that Flanagan fails to establish the consistency between ethical normativity and physicalism. Hence, another form of mysterianism seems to emerge within this normative mind science.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science is the property of Open Library of Humanities and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Zygon: Journal of Religion & Science
      holder: Open Library of Humanities
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N