Development and initial evaluation of an instrument to assess physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on clients’ behavior change.

Background and Aim: A systematically developed and evaluated instrument is needed to support investigations of physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning integrated with the process of clients’ behavior change. This study’s aim was to develop an instrument to assess physiotherapy students’ and physiothera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physiotherapy Theory & Practice Vol. 34; no. 5; pp. 367 - 384
Main Authors: Elvén, Maria, Hochwälder, Jacek, Dean, Elizabeth, Söderlund, Anne
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd May2018
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=128103993&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 128103993
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09593985
        BCJ
      jtl: Physiotherapy Theory & Practice
      issn: 09593985
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2018
      vid: 34
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        128103993
        128103993
        128103993
        10.1080/09593985.2017.1419521
        128103993
      ppf: 367
      ppct: 17
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Development and initial evaluation of an instrument to assess physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on clients’ behavior change.
      aug:
        au:
          Elvén, Maria
          Hochwälder, Jacek
          Dean, Elizabeth
          Söderlund, Anne
        affil: Division of Physiotherapy, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden
      sug:
        subj:
          Physical Therapists
          Behavioral Changes
          Patients
          Decision Making, Clinical Evaluation
          Critical Thinking Evaluation
          Instrument Construction
          Human
          Students, Physical Therapy
          Behavior
          Content Validity
          Interviews
          Delphi Technique
          Vignettes
          Consensus
          Exploratory Research
          Interview Guides
          Purposive Sample
          Audiorecording
          Male
          Female
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Data Analysis Software
          Summated Rating Scaling
          Descriptive Statistics
          Scales
          Sweden
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Background and Aim: A systematically developed and evaluated instrument is needed to support investigations of physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning integrated with the process of clients’ behavior change. This study’s aim was to develop an instrument to assess physiotherapy students’ and physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning focused on clients’ activity-related behavior and behavior change, and initiate its evaluation, including feasibility and content validity.Methods: The study was conducted in three phases: 1) determination of instrument structure and item generation, based on a model, guidelines for assessing clinical reasoning, and existing measures; 2) cognitive interviews with five physiotherapy students to evaluate item understanding and feasibility; and 3) a Delphi process with 18 experts to evaluate content relevance.Results: Phase 1 resulted in an instrument with four domains: Physiotherapist; Input from client; Functional behavioral analysis; and Strategies for behavior change. The instrument consists of case scenarios followed by items in which key features are identified, prioritized, or interpreted. Phase 2 resulted in revisions of problems and approval of feasibility. Phase 3 demonstrated high level of consensus regarding the instrument’s content relevance.Conclusions: This feasible and content-validated instrument shows potential for use in investigations of physiotherapy students’ and physiotherapists’ clinical reasoning, however continued development and testing are needed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N