SOCIAL CLASS AND COLOR DIFFERENCES IN CHILD-REARING.
In recent years, cultural anthropologists and social psychologists have made intensive studies of the relationships between personality and socialization. They have arrived at a methodological distinction which has proved helpful in the analysis of personality. In the light of their comparative data...
| Publicado en: | American Sociological Review Vol. 11; no. 6; pp. 698 - 711 |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
Dec46
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=12811976&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 12811976 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00031224 ASC jtl: American Sociological Review issn: 00031224 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec46 vid: 11 iid: 6 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. artinfo: ui: 12811976 10.2307/2087065 ppf: 698 ppct: 13 formats: tig: atl: SOCIAL CLASS AND COLOR DIFFERENCES IN CHILD-REARING. aug: su: Personality Socialization Hypothesis Child rearing Social groups Population sug: subj: Personality Socialization Hypothesis Child rearing Social groups Population ab: In recent years, cultural anthropologists and social psychologists have made intensive studies of the relationships between personality and socialization. They have arrived at a methodological distinction which has proved helpful in the analysis of personality. In the light of their comparative data on the socialization of individual children in different societies, they have set up the operational principle that personality can best be studied in terms of two basic interacting systems of behavior. One system of actions, feelings and thoughts is cultural. It is learned by the individual from his basic social groups: his family, his age-groups, his sex group, his social-class group, and so on. The other system of responses is individual, or "idiosyncratic," or "private." The use of this hypothesis and its various derivative forms seems likely to bring some order into the chaotic field of personality studies. As a methodological distinction, it is useful both in the exploration of the life-history, and likewise in the cross-sectional study of personality-traits in a population. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 1946 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|