Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control.
It is critical to accelerate the integration of evidence-based programs, practices, and strategies for cancer prevention and control into clinical, community, and public health settings. While it is clear that effective translation of existing knowledge into practice can reduce cancer burden, it is...
| Publicado en: | Cancer Causes & Control Vol. 29; no. 3; pp. 363 - 370 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Mar2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=128273349&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 128273349 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09575243 ODX jtl: Cancer Causes & Control issn: 09575243 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Mar2018 vid: 29 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 128273349 128273349 NLM29417296 10.1007/s10552-018-1008-1 NLM29417296 128273349 ppf: 363 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Participatory implementation science to increase the impact of evidence-based cancer prevention and control. aug: au: Ramanadhan, Shoba Davis, Melinda M. Armstrong, Rebecca Baquero, Barbara Ko, Linda K. Leng, Jennifer C. Salloum, Ramzi G. Vaughn, Nicole A. Brownson, Ross C. affil: Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Ave, LW 601, 02215, Boston, MA, USA sug: subj: Neoplasms Prevention and Control Health Services Research Impact of Events Scale Scales ab: It is critical to accelerate the integration of evidence-based programs, practices, and strategies for cancer prevention and control into clinical, community, and public health settings. While it is clear that effective translation of existing knowledge into practice can reduce cancer burden, it is less clear how best to achieve this. This gap is addressed by the rapidly growing field of implementation science. Given that context influences and is influenced by implementation efforts, engaging stakeholders in the co-production of knowledge and solutions offers an opportunity to increase the likelihood that implementation efforts are useful, scalable, and sustainable in real-world settings. We argue that a participatory implementation science approach is critical, as it supports iterative, ongoing engagement between stakeholders and researchers to improve the pathway between research and practice, create system change, and address health disparities and health equity. This article highlights the utility of participatory implementation science for cancer prevention and control research and addresses (a) the spectrum of participatory research approaches that may be of use, (b) benefits of participatory implementation science, and pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|