Volumetric assessment of sphenoid sinuses through segmentation on CT scan.

Purpose Computed tomography represents the gold standard for the assessment of morphological characteristics of sphenoid sinuses, whose anatomy has acquired a novel interest because of the recent introduction of transsphenoidal surgery and robot-assisted procedures. One of the most relevant paramete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgical & Radiologic Anatomy Vol. 40; no. 2; pp. 193 - 199
Main Authors: Gibelli, Daniele, Cellina, Michaela, Gibelli, Stefano, Oliva, Antonio Giancarlo, Codari, Marina, Termine, Giovanni, Sforza, Chiarella
Format: Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Feb2018
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Purpose Computed tomography represents the gold standard for the assessment of morphological characteristics of sphenoid sinuses, whose anatomy has acquired a novel interest because of the recent introduction of transsphenoidal surgery and robot-assisted procedures. One of the most relevant parameters for planning surgical intervention is the volume of sphenoid sinuses, and with time few population studies have been published. However, at present, no data are available concerning the relation between volume and anatomical variants of sphenoid sinuses. Methods We retrospectively evaluated head CT-scans of 100 patients (age range 25-99 years; mean age males 45.0; mean age females 50.5 years) to calculate the volume of sphenoid sinuses through automatic segmentation. Possible statistically significant differences according to sex and variants of pneumatization, and type of sinus were assessed, respectively, through Student's t test and one-way ANOVA test (p < 0.05). Results Average volume of sphenoid sinuses in males was 10.005 ± 5.101 cm³, in females 7.920 ± 3.176 cm³. Differences according to sex were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Patients with pneumatization of pterygoid processes, dorsum sellae and anterior clinoid processes had a significantly higher volume than unaffected subjects. Moreover, differences of volume according to the type of sphenoid sinus were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions Results show that volume of sphenoid sinuses strongly depend upon the type of sinus and possible pneumatization variants. Moreover, the important of ethnic variability is confirmed.