Comparing the dimensional structure and diagnostic algorithms between <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> and <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> PTSD in children and adolescents.

In contrast to the <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic>, which expanded the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom profile to 20 symptoms, a workgroup of the upcoming <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> suggested a reduced symptom profile with six symptoms for PTSD. Therefore, the obje...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry Vol. 27; no. 2; pp. 181 - 191
Autores principales: Sachser, Cedric, Berliner, Lucy, Holt, Tonje, Jensen, Tine, Jungbluth, Nathaniel, Risch, Elizabeth, Rosner, Rita, Goldbeck, Lutz
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Feb2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:In contrast to the <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic>, which expanded the posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom profile to 20 symptoms, a workgroup of the upcoming <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> suggested a reduced symptom profile with six symptoms for PTSD. Therefore, the objective of the study was to investigate the dimensional structure of <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> and <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> PTSD in a clinical sample of trauma-exposed children and adolescents and to compare the diagnostic rates of PTSD between diagnostic systems. The study sample consisted of 475 self-reports and 424 caregiver-reports on the child and adolescent trauma screen (CATS), which were collected at pediatric mental health clinics in the US, Norway and Germany. The factor structure of the PTSD construct as defined in the <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> and in alternative models of both <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> and <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> was investigated using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). To evaluate differences in PTSD prevalence, McNemar’s tests for correlated proportions were used. CFA results demonstrated excellent model fit for the proposed <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> model of PTSD. For the <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> models we found the best fit for the hybrid model. Diagnostic rates were significantly lower according to <italic>ICD-11</italic> (self-report: 23.4%; caregiver-report: 16.5%) compared with the <italic>DSM-5</italic> (self-report: 37.8%; caregiver-report: 31.8%). Agreement was low between diagnostic systems. Study findings provide support for an alternative latent dimensionality of <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> PTSD in children and adolescents. The conceptualization of <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> PTSD shows an excellent fit. Inconsistent PTSD constructs and significantly diverging diagnostic rates between <italic>DSM</italic>-<italic>5</italic> and the <italic>ICD</italic>-<italic>11</italic> will result in major challenges for researchers and clinicians in the field of psychotraumatology.