Trephine Core Procedure Versus Bone-Added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in the Augmentation of the Sinus Floor: A Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Study.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically compare the trephine core procedure and the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique in the augmentation of the sinus floor. Materials and Methods: A single site in each subject requiring sinus augmentation where the r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants Vol. 33; no. 2; pp. 425 - 433
Autores principales: Chandra, Rampalli Viswa, Suvvari, Neeraja, Reddy, Aileni Amarender
Formato: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Quintessence Publishing Company Inc. Mar/Apr2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=128618336&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 128618336
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08822786
        GR1
      jtl: International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants
      issn: 08822786
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar/Apr2018
      vid: 33
      iid: 2
      pid: 1935
      pub: Quintessence Publishing Company Inc.
      place: Batavia, Illinois
    artinfo:
      ui:
        128618336
        128618336
        128618336
        10.11607/jomi.5998
        128618336
      ppf: 425
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Trephine Core Procedure Versus Bone-Added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation in the Augmentation of the Sinus Floor: A Comparative Clinical and Radiographic Study.
      aug:
        au:
          Chandra, Rampalli Viswa
          Suvvari, Neeraja
          Reddy, Aileni Amarender
        affil: Professor and Head, Department of Periodontics, SVS Institute of Dental Sciences, Mahabubnagar, Telangana, India
      sug:
        subj:
          Stability
          Maxillary Sinus Surgery
          Bone Transplantation Methods
          Bone Transplantation Equipment and Supplies
          Surgical Instruments
          Radiography, Dental
          Bone Regeneration
          Dental Implants
          Human
          Comparative Studies
          Tomography, X-Ray Computed
          Postoperative Period
          Wound Healing
          Edema
          Pain
          Visual Analog Scaling
          Angiography, Digital Subtraction
          Software
          Image Processing, Computer Assisted
      ab: Purpose: The aim of this study was to clinically and radiographically compare the trephine core procedure and the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique in the augmentation of the sinus floor. Materials and Methods: A single site in each subject requiring sinus augmentation where the residual bone height was ~4 mm was randomly allocated to either the trephine core procedure or the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique. Measures of bone fill and bone height were also acquired through scans from cone beam computed tomography obtained before the sinus augmentation procedure (baseline) and before implant placement at approximately 6 months postoperatively. Clinical parameters for healing (early wound healing index), swelling (measurement of preset facial landmarks), and pain (through visual analog scale) were assessed at 1 week and 2 weeks after surgery. The evaluation of bone fill was performed using the digital subtraction technique and morphometric area analysis on the baseline and postoperative scans using two kinds of image processing software. Implants were placed after a healing period of 4 to 6 months, and implant stability quotient values (using SmartPeg Type 49) were recorded immediately after implant placement. Results: While both of the procedures resulted in an increase in bone fill and bone height, there were no significant differences between the techniques. No significant differences were observed between the two groups for implant stability quotient values after implant placement. No significant differences were observed between the two groups for measures of healing, swelling, and pain. Conclusion: Based upon this study that compared the trephine core procedure with the bone-added osteotome sinus elevation technique, comparing bone height, bone fill, and primary implant stability, the two procedures appeared to perform in an equivalent fashion.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N