Paradox of choice and the illusion of autonomy: The construction of ethical subjects in right-to-die activism.

The right to die is an issue is predicated on larger cultural understandings of autonomy. Autonomy, in turn, is centered around assumptions of choice, that individuals are able to make health-related decisions based on a rational calculation. In such a way, a medically assisted death is differentiat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Death Studies Vol. 42; no. 5; pp. 329 - 336
Autor principal: Gandsman, Ari
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd May/Jun2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=128746617&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 128746617
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07481187
        DEA
      jtl: Death Studies
      issn: 07481187
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May/Jun2018
      vid: 42
      iid: 5
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        128746617
        10.1080/07481187.2017.1396646
      ppf: 329
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Paradox of choice and the illusion of autonomy: The construction of ethical subjects in right-to-die activism.
      aug:
        au: Gandsman, Ari
        affil: School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
      su:
        Australia
        North America
        Assisted suicide
        Autonomy (Psychology)
        Ethics
        Ethnology
        Right to die
        Social change
        Suicide
        Decision making in clinical medicine
      sug:
        subj:
          Assisted suicide
          Autonomy (Psychology)
          Ethics
          Ethnology
          Right to die
          Social change
          Suicide
          Australia
          North America
          Decision making in clinical medicine
      ab: The right to die is an issue is predicated on larger cultural understandings of autonomy. Autonomy, in turn, is centered around assumptions of choice, that individuals are able to make health-related decisions based on a rational calculation. In such a way, a medically assisted death is differentiated from suicide. Through an ethnographic study of right-to-die activists in North America and Australia and how they understand ideals of “good deaths,” this article will complicate this view by examining the ethical subject constructed by such activism that reveals autonomy to be a useful guiding fiction that mask larger ethical relationships.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N