“ ‘Signature Event Context’ … in, well, <italic>context</italic>”.
This article concerns a moment in French intellectual history when the self-evidences of structuralism become doubtful under the pressure exerted by <italic>discourse</italic>; it thus treats a <italic>second turn</italic> within the linguistic turn as it occurred in France. The work of Emile Benven...
| Publicado en: | Journal of the Philosophy of History Vol. 12; no. 1; pp. 117 - 142 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=128747460&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 128747460 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 1872261X 2SGR jtl: Journal of the Philosophy of History issn: 1872261X maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 12 iid: 1 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 128747460 10.1163/18722636-12341337 ppf: 117 ppct: 25 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 535KB tig: atl: “ ‘Signature Event Context’ … in, well, <italic>context</italic>”. aug: au: Kates, Joshua affil: Indiana University su: Intellectual history Structuralism Searle, John sug: subj: Intellectual history Structuralism Searle, John keyword: Benveniste Derrida discourse form linguistic turn Searle ab: This article concerns a moment in French intellectual history when the self-evidences of structuralism become doubtful under the pressure exerted by <italic>discourse</italic>; it thus treats a <italic>second turn</italic> within the linguistic turn as it occurred in France. The work of Emile Benveniste, and texts by Jean-Francois Lyotard and Paul Ricoeur, flesh out this development. I use them, as well as John Searle’s response, to approach anew Derrida’s essay “Signature Event Context.” Derrida’s distance from this second linguistic turn thereby becomes visible (including from Lacan’s, Barthes’, and Foucault’s versions of it), and the distinct status of <italic>discourse</italic> in Derrida’s own thought emerges. Finally, critiquing Derrida’s folding of discourse into a notion of “signifying form” in sec, while drawing on his account there of “citationality,” I sketch new directions for conceiving of context and discourse themselves, ones arguably able to withstand Derrida’s express concerns. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Journal of the Philosophy of History is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Journal of the Philosophy of History holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|