The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science.
Abstract: Rationale, aims, and objectives: “Implementation science,” the scientific study of methods translating research findings into practical, useful outcomes, is contested and complex, with unpredictable use of results from routine clinical practice and different levels of continuing assessment...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 117 - 127 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Feb2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=128747629&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 128747629 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13561294 EV1 jtl: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice issn: 13561294 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Feb2018 vid: 24 iid: 1 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 128747629 128747629 128747629 10.1111/jep.12741 128747629 ppf: 117 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science. aug: au: Rapport, Frances Clay‐Williams, Robyn Churruca, Kate Shih, Patti Hogden, Anne Braithwaite, Jeffrey affil: Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia sug: subj: Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Concept Analysis Human Health Services Research Diffusion of Innovation Health Policy Research Personnel Paradigms Quality of Health Care ab: Abstract: Rationale, aims, and objectives: “Implementation science,” the scientific study of methods translating research findings into practical, useful outcomes, is contested and complex, with unpredictable use of results from routine clinical practice and different levels of continuing assessment of implementable interventions. The authors aim to reveal how implementation science is presented and understood in health services research contexts and clarify the foundational concepts: diffusion, dissemination, implementation, adoption, and sustainability, to progress knowledge in the field. Method: Implementation science models, theories, and frameworks are critiqued, and their value for laying the groundwork from which to implement a study's findings is emphasised. The paper highlights the challenges of turning research findings into practical outcomes that can be successfully implemented and the need for support from change agents, to ensure improvements to health care provision, health systems, and policy. The paper examines how researchers create implementation plans and what needs to be considered for study outputs to lead to sustainable interventions. This aspect needs clear planning, underpinned by appropriate theoretical paradigms that rigorously respond to a study's aims and objectives. Conclusion: Researchers might benefit from a return to first principles in implementation science, whereby applications that result from research endeavours are both effective and readily disseminated and where interventions can be supported by appropriate health care personnel. These should be people specifically identified to promote change in service organisation, delivery, and policy that can be systematically evaluated over time, to ensure high‐quality, long‐term improvements to patients' health. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|