Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach.
In October 2016, the White House, the European Parliament, and the UK House of Commons each issued a report outlining their visions on how to prepare society for the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we provide a comparative assessment of these three reports in order t...
| Publicado en: | Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 505 - 529 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Apr2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=128766119&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 128766119 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13533452 GNI jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics issn: 13533452 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Apr2018 vid: 24 iid: 2 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature artinfo: ui: 128766119 10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7 ppf: 505 ppct: 24 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 504KB tig: atl: Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. aug: au: Cath, Corinne Wachter, Sandra Mittelstadt, Brent Taddeo, Mariarosaria Floridi, Luciano affil: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, 1 St Giles, OX1 3JS, Oxford, UK The Alan Turing Institute, Headquartered at the British Library, 96 Euston Road, NW1 2DB, London, UK su: Artificial intelligence European Parliament Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons Research ethics Technological innovations & society sug: subj: Artificial intelligence European Parliament Great Britain. Parliament. House of Commons Research ethics Technological innovations & society keyword: Algorithms Data ethics Good society Human dignity ab: In October 2016, the White House, the European Parliament, and the UK House of Commons each issued a report outlining their visions on how to prepare society for the widespread use of artificial intelligence (AI). In this article, we provide a comparative assessment of these three reports in order to facilitate the design of policies favourable to the development of a ‘good AI society’. To do so, we examine how each report addresses the following three topics: (a) the development of a ‘good AI society’; (b) the role and responsibility of the government, the private sector, and the research community (including academia) in pursuing such a development; and (c) where the recommendations to support such a development may be in need of improvement. Our analysis concludes that the reports address adequately various ethical, social, and economic topics, but come short of providing an overarching political vision and long-term strategy for the development of a ‘good AI society’. In order to contribute to fill this gap, in the conclusion we suggest a two-pronged approach. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2018. All Rights Reserved. item: Science & Engineering Ethics holder: Springer Nature dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|