Understanding Multiple Perspectives: The Contribution of a Short-Essay Assignment to Teaching about the Arab–Israeli Conflict.

Teaching about political conflict requires an understanding of the multiple perspectives and motivations of the parties to the conflict. This is especially true when teaching students who may have strong predispositions, such as in classes on the Arab–Israeli conflict. Various active-learning techni...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PS: Political Science & Politics Vol. 51; no. 2; pp. 434 - 440
Main Authors: Yakter, Alon, Tessler, Mark
Format: Article
Published: Cambridge University Press Apr2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=128866246&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 128866246
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10490965
        PSP
      jtl: PS: Political Science & Politics
      issn: 10490965
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2018
      vid: 51
      iid: 2
      pid: 15979
      pub: Cambridge University Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        128866246
        10.1017/S104909651700230X
      ppf: 434
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Understanding Multiple Perspectives: The Contribution of a Short-Essay Assignment to Teaching about the Arab–Israeli Conflict.
      aug:
        au:
          Yakter, Alon
          Tessler, Mark
        affil: University of Michigan
      su:
        Motivation (Psychology)
        Adversary system (Law)
      sug:
        subj:
          Motivation (Psychology)
          Adversary system (Law)
      ab: Teaching about political conflict requires an understanding of the multiple perspectives and motivations of the parties to the conflict. This is especially true when teaching students who may have strong predispositions, such as in classes on the Arab–Israeli conflict. Various active-learning techniques address this problem but often at a cost of long preparation, substantial class time, and class-size limitations. This article offers both quantitative and qualitative evidence that a short essay asking students to defend a key action taken by one of the actors makes them more understanding and less accusatory of that side—even as it does not change their overall attitude toward the conflict. Adding a small-group discussion and a written reflection further helps students to make more informed and reasoned judgments. Importantly, such an assignment is easy to create, implement, and modify across various class types, sizes, and constraints.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N