Facial Expressiveness in Infants With and Without Craniofacial Microsomia.
Objective: To compare facial expressiveness (FE) of infants with and without craniofacial macrosomia (cases and controls, respectively) and to compare phenotypic variation among cases in relation to FE. Design: Positive and negative affect was elicited in response to standardized emotion inductions,...
| Publicado en: | Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal Vol. 55; no. 5; pp. 711 - 721 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
| Formato: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Sage Publications Inc.
May2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129158376&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 129158376 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10556656 DF1 jtl: Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal issn: 10556656 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2018 vid: 55 iid: 5 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 129158376 129158376 129158376 10.1177/1055665617753481 129158376 ppf: 711 ppct: 10 formats: tig: atl: Facial Expressiveness in Infants With and Without Craniofacial Microsomia. aug: au: Hammal, Zakia Cohn, Jeffrey F. Wallace, Erin R. Heike, Carrie L. Birgfeld, Craig B. Oster, Harriet Speltz, Matthew L. affil: Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA sug: subj: Goldenhar Syndrome Psychosocial Factors Facial Expression In Infancy and Childhood Phenotype Human Exploratory Research Case Control Studies Emotions Videorecording Hospitals, Pediatric United States United States Confidence Intervals Infant Prevalence Affect Mandible Pathology Nervous System Diseases Effect Size Infant: 1-23 months ab: Objective: To compare facial expressiveness (FE) of infants with and without craniofacial macrosomia (cases and controls, respectively) and to compare phenotypic variation among cases in relation to FE. Design: Positive and negative affect was elicited in response to standardized emotion inductions, video recorded, and manually coded from video using the Facial Action Coding System for Infants and Young Children. Setting: Five craniofacial centers: Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Seattle Children’s Hospital, University of Illinois–Chicago, and University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill. Participants: Eighty ethnically diverse 12- to 14-month-old infants. Main Outcome Measures: FE was measured on a frame-by-frame basis as the sum of 9 observed facial action units (AUs) representative of positive and negative affect. Results: FE differed between conditions intended to elicit positive and negative affect (95% confidence interval = 0.09-0.66, P = .01). FE failed to differ between cases and controls (ES = –0.16 to –0.02, P = .47 to .92). Among cases, those with and without mandibular hypoplasia showed similar levels of FE (ES = –0.38 to 0.54, P = .10 to .66). Conclusions: FE varied between positive and negative affect, and cases and controls responded similarly. Null findings for case/control differences may be attributable to a lower than anticipated prevalence of nerve palsy among cases, the selection of AUs, or the use of manual coding. In future research, we will reexamine group differences using an automated, computer vision approach that can cover a broader range of facial movements and their dynamics. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|