An exploratory case study on letter-based, head-movement-driven communication.

BACKGROUND: With alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) people with complex communication needs (CCN) become more independent and express themselves to the fullest extent possible. In finding the best AAC solution, mobile technology and ICT (information and communications technology) provi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Technology & Disability Vol. 29; no. 4; pp. 153 - 162
Autores principales: Miksztai-Réthey, Brigitta, Faragó, Kinga Bettina
Formato: case study pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. 2017
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129253855&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 129253855
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10554181
        3QS
      jtl: Technology & Disability
      issn: 10554181
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2017
      vid: 29
      iid: 4
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129253855
        129253855
        129253855
        10.3233/TAD-160163
        129253855
      ppf: 153
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: An exploratory case study on letter-based, head-movement-driven communication.
      aug:
        au:
          Miksztai-Réthey, Brigitta
          Faragó, Kinga Bettina
        affil: Bárczi Gusztáv Faculty of Special Education, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
      sug:
        subj:
          Alternative and Augmentative Communication
          Assistive Technology
          Communication Methods
          Human
          Case Studies
          Exploratory Research
          Keyboards Methods
          Head
          Movement
          American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
          Algorithms
          Technology Trends
          Pilot Studies
      ab: BACKGROUND: With alternative and augmentative communication (AAC) people with complex communication needs (CCN) become more independent and express themselves to the fullest extent possible. In finding the best AAC solution, mobile technology and ICT (information and communications technology) provide new opportunities every day. Although a wide range of assistive technologies (AT) are available, matching person and technology (MPT) and setting the optimal parameters individually are essential. For an AAC solution to be optimal for letter-based communication it has to be easy-to-use, comfortable, and fast. OBJECTIVES: For people with severe speech and physical impairments (SSPI), one method to interact with a computer is using head-movement-driven mouse. There are different on-screen devices available for typing via head movements, and much work has been done to compare them in terms of the time required for typing. Dasher is one of the fastest software tools with a setting option for zooming speed. An optimistic initial model (OIM) based on Markov decision process (MDP) has already been shown to optimize this zooming speed for increasing the typing efficiency of persons without SSPI. Since this reinforcement learning component has so far been tested on neurotypical users only (e.g., research assistants), in the present case study we involved a user with SSPI. Our question was whether the algorithm can optimize its own parameters in these circumstances. METHODS: To document all relevant aspects of the human-computer interaction log files, screen and webcam videos were collected. These input data were later analyzed with mathematical methods based on the OIM reward systems feedbacks. In addition, manual interpretation using semi-supervised machine video annotation was carried out for analyzing screen events and user behaviors. RESULTS: The human annotations of the recorded video data indicated that the participant had at least two different typing strategies. In contrast with the data from a previous study, in our study the artificial intelligence (AI) component was unable to find optimal settings similar to those attained when only one typing strategy was used by subjects without SSPI. CONCLUSIONS: To maximize communication efficiency, a more complex assistive tool may be more appropriate. Closer cooperation between different areas of expertise is suggested in order to achieve solutions employing various methods.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        case study
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N