Rescuing Peacebuilding? Anthropology and Peace Formation.

International Relations (IR) and related social science disciplines focusing on peace and conflict studies have enabled a bureaucratic understanding of peacebuilding and a liberal form of peace. This has extended into a neoliberal type of statebuilding. There is now an impressive international archi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 221 - 240
Autor principal: Richmond, Oliver P.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129343524&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 129343524
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13600826
        0V3
      jtl: Global Society: Journal of Interdisciplinary International Relations
      issn: 13600826
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2018
      vid: 32
      iid: 2
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129343524
        10.1080/13600826.2018.1451828
      ppf: 221
      ppct: 19
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Rescuing Peacebuilding? Anthropology and Peace Formation.
      aug:
        au: Richmond, Oliver P.
      su:
        International relations
        Neoliberalism
        Peace
        Burton, John
        Liberalism
      sug:
        subj:
          International relations
          Neoliberalism
          Peace
          Burton, John
          Liberalism
      ab: International Relations (IR) and related social science disciplines focusing on peace and conflict studies have enabled a bureaucratic understanding of peacebuilding and a liberal form of peace. This has extended into a neoliberal type of statebuilding. There is now an impressive international architecture for peace, but its engagement with its subjects in everyday contexts has been less impressive. An earlier group of conflict researchers, grouped around John Burton and later A.J.R. Groom, have long argued that this is partly because IR has concentrated on elite power, problem-solving methodology and positivist epistemologies. It has failed to understand the dynamics, agency and hybridity of human society and institutions when it comes to peace, or that inequality is conflict inducing. Rescuing peacebuilding from neoliberal epistemological frameworks requires an anthropological and ethnographic sensitivity.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N