Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened.
Data on the public’s reactions to online tailored colorectal cancer (CRC) risk estimates are sparse. We assessed among 560 men and women aged 50-75 with no CRC screening history reactions to online tailored CRC estimated comparative risk (i.e., self vs. other their age and sex). Assessed were reacti...
| Published in: | Journal of Behavioral Medicine Vol. 41; no. 3; pp. 289 - 299 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Springer Nature
Jun2018
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129344393&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 129344393 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01607715 JBM jtl: Journal of Behavioral Medicine issn: 01607715 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2018 vid: 41 iid: 3 pid: 237 pub: Springer Nature place: New York, New York artinfo: ui: 129344393 129344393 129344393 10.1007/s10865-017-9902-7 129344393 ppf: 289 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Reactions to online colorectal cancer risk estimates among a nationally representative sample of adults who have never been screened. aug: au: Lipkus, Isaac M. Johnson, Constance M. Amarasekara, Sathya Pan, Wei Updegraff, John A. affil: Duke University School of Nursing, 307 Trent Dr., 27710, Durham, NC, USA sug: subj: Colorectal Neoplasms Risk Factors Colorectal Neoplasms Diagnosis Risk Assessment Attitude to Risk Cancer Screening Online Services Human Male Female Middle Age Aged Sex Factors Intention Validity Emotions Middle Aged: 45-64 years Aged: 65+ years Male Female ab: Data on the public’s reactions to online tailored colorectal cancer (CRC) risk estimates are sparse. We assessed among 560 men and women aged 50-75 with no CRC screening history reactions to online tailored CRC estimated comparative risk (i.e., self vs. other their age and sex). Assessed were reactions to estimate (i.e., repeating back estimate, match between perceived comparative risk and estimate, accuracy and usefulness of estimate, emotional reactions), risk appraisals and screening intentions. 73% of the sample accurately repeated back their estimate; the match between perceived comparative risk and the estimate was lowest among those informed of being at higher risk. Higher estimates were viewed as less useful and evoked more negative emotions. Viewing the estimate as more useful and experiencing more negative emotions were related with higher risk appraisals and, in turn, screening intentions. These data indicate that adults at higher comparative risk resist accepting a higher risk status. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|