GRYNOJI IR DIALOGINĖ FENOMENOLOGIJA.
The article strives to show why one needs to discard the common conception of phenomenology, according to which phenomenology is a peculiar form of reflection that is grounded in the first-person point of view. Rather, an investigation can be identified as phenomenological in the Husserlian sense of...
| Publicado en: | Problems / Problemos Vol. 93; pp. 47 - 60 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Vilnius University
2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129358674&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 129358674 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 13921126 3D4C jtl: Problems / Problemos issn: 13921126 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 93 pid: 16037 pub: Vilnius University artinfo: ui: 129358674 10.15388/Problemos.2018.93.11750 ppf: 47 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P size: 2.2MB tig: atl: GRYNOJI IR DIALOGINĖ FENOMENOLOGIJA. aug: au: Geniušas, Saulius affil: 4/F Fung King Hey Bld., Department of Philosophy Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin N.T., Hong Kong SAR sug: keyword: dialogical phenomenology eidetic variation factual variation phenomenological reduction pure phenomenology dialoginė fenomenologija eidetinė variacija epoché faktinė variacija fenomenologinė redukcija grynoji fenomenologija ab: The article strives to show why one needs to discard the common conception of phenomenology, according to which phenomenology is a peculiar form of reflection that is grounded in the first-person point of view. Rather, an investigation can be identified as phenomenological in the Husserlian sense of the term if, and only if, it is based on three fundamental phenomenological principles, viz., epoché, phenomenological reduction and eidetic variation. These principles must be conceived as three irreplaceable phenomenological principles that make up the basis of pure phenomenology. These three principles are necessary, yet they are not sufficient: they must be supplemented with the principle of factual variation. The article argues that the incorporation of the principle of factual variation into the field of phenomenological research transforms pure phenomenology into dialogical phenomenology. Straipsnyje siekiama parodyti, kodėl reikia atmesti populiarią fenomenologijos sampratą, pagal kurią fenomenologija yra pirmąja asmens perspektyva paremta refleksija. Straipsnyje argumentuojama, kad tyrinėjimas gali būti įvardijamas kaip fenomenologinis huserliškąja prasme, jeigu ir tik jeigu jis yra paremtas trimis pamatiniais fenomenologiniais principais - epoché, fenomenologine redukcija ir eidetine variacija - suprantant juos kaip nepakeičiamus fenomenologinius principus, sudarančius grynosios fenomenologijos pamatą. Šie trys fenomenologiniai principai yra būtini, bet nepakankami: jie turi būti papildyti faktinės variacijos principu. Straipsnyje pristatoma pozicija, kad faktinės variacijos inkorporavimas į fenomenologinių tyrinėjimų lauką transformuoja grynąją fenomenologiją į dialoginę fenomenologiją. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: Lithuanian refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Problems / Problemos is the property of Vilnius University and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Problems / Problemos holder: Vilnius University dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|