What's So Bad About Killer Robots?

Abstract: Robotic warfare has now become a real prospect. One issue that has generated heated debate concerns the development of ‘Killer Robots’. These are weapons that, once programmed, are capable of finding and engaging a target without supervision by a human operator. From a conceptual perspecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Applied Philosophy Vol. 35; no. 2; pp. 341 - 359
Main Author: Leveringhaus, Alex
Format: Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell May2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129410118&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 129410118
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02643758
        BQ0
      jtl: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      issn: 02643758
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2018
      vid: 35
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129410118
        10.1111/japp.12200
      ppf: 341
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 122KB
      tig:
        atl: What's So Bad About Killer Robots?
      aug:
        au: Leveringhaus, Alex
        affil: Department of Politics, University of Sheffield, Elmfield Building, Sheffield, S10 2TU, UK
      su:
        Autonomous robots
        Artificial intelligence
        Drone aircraft
        War & society
        Technological innovations
      sug:
        subj:
          Autonomous robots
          Artificial intelligence
          Drone aircraft
          War & society
          Technological innovations
      ab: Abstract: Robotic warfare has now become a real prospect. One issue that has generated heated debate concerns the development of ‘Killer Robots’. These are weapons that, once programmed, are capable of finding and engaging a target without supervision by a human operator. From a conceptual perspective, the debate on Killer Robots has been rather confused, not least because it is unclear how central elements of these weapons can be defined. Offering a precise take on the relevant conceptual issues, the article contends that Killer Robots are best seen as executors of targeting decisions made by their human programmers. However, from a normative perspective, the execution of targeting decisions by Killer Robots should worry us. The article argues that what is morally bad about Killer Robots is that they replace human agency in warfare with artificial agency, a development which should be resisted. Finally, the article contends that the issue of agency points to a wider problem in just war theory, namely the role of moral rights in our normative reasoning on armed conflict.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Journal of Applied Philosophy is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Journal of Applied Philosophy
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N