Implementation science theories to inform efforts for de-implementation of urologic oncology care practices resulting in overuse and misuse.

The field of implementation science has been conventionally applied in the context of increasing the application of evidence-based practices into clinical care, given evidence of underusage of appropriate interventions in many settings. Increasingly, however, there is recognition of the potential fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Urologic Oncology Vol. 36; no. 5; pp. 252 - 257
Autores principales: Nielsen, Matthew E., Birken, Sarah A.
Formato: review Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. May2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129449908&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 129449908
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10781439
        JJ4
      jtl: Urologic Oncology
      issn: 10781439
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May2018
      vid: 36
      iid: 5
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129449908
        129449908
        NLM29566976
        129449908
        10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.02.010
        NLM29566976
        129449908
      ppf: 252
      ppct: 5
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Implementation science theories to inform efforts for de-implementation of urologic oncology care practices resulting in overuse and misuse.
      aug:
        au:
          Nielsen, Matthew E.
          Birken, Sarah A.
        affil: Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
      sug:
        subj:
          Health and Welfare Planning
          Quality Improvement
          Urologic Neoplasms Therapy
          Health Care Delivery Standards
          Utilization Review
      ab: The field of implementation science has been conventionally applied in the context of increasing the application of evidence-based practices into clinical care, given evidence of underusage of appropriate interventions in many settings. Increasingly, however, there is recognition of the potential for similar frameworks to inform efforts to reduce the application of ineffective or potentially harmful practices. In this article, we provide some examples of clinical scenarios in which the quality problem may be overuse and misuse, and review relevant theories and frameworks that may inform improvement activities.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N