What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology.

In its first decade, Bitcoin has not proven to be a practical money form for most circumstances, but it has become a staging ground for debate around the cultural role of money in society. This debate is poised between two related but ultimately incompatible techno-economic imaginaries: infrastructu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Cultural Studies Vol. 32; no. 4; pp. 623 - 651
Autor principal: Swartz, Lana
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Jul2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129483800&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 129483800
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09502386
        05G
      jtl: Cultural Studies
      issn: 09502386
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jul2018
      vid: 32
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129483800
        10.1080/09502386.2017.1416420
      ppf: 623
      ppct: 28
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 2.2MB
      tig:
        atl: What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology.
      aug:
        au: Swartz, Lana
        affil: Department of Media Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
      su:
        Bitcoin
        Digital currency
        Electronic wallets
        Money
        Electronic commerce
      sug:
        subj:
          Bitcoin
          Digital currency
          Electronic wallets
          Money
          Electronic commerce
      keyword:
        infrastructure
        metallism
        money
        mutualism
        payment
        peer-to-peer
        techno-utopianism
        technology
      ab: In its first decade, Bitcoin has not proven to be a practical money form for most circumstances, but it has become a staging ground for debate around the cultural role of money in society. This debate is poised between two related but ultimately incompatible techno-economic imaginaries: infrastructural mutualism and digital metallism. Each offers a theory not just of money, but also of relations, identities, and the larger imaginaries we call 'society' and 'the economy'. In particular, they offer distinct visions of what it means to be a 'peer' in a peer-topeer money system, and perhaps, a peer-to-peer society. This article traces the pre-history of Bitcoin, as well as more recent developments, to inquire about its future, as well as the future of money more broadly.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Cultural Studies is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Cultural Studies
      holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N