The semiotics of models.

The paper sheds light on the concept of model in ordinary language and in scientific discourse from the perspective of C. S. Peirce's semiotics. It proposes a general Peircean framework for the definition of models of all kinds, including mental models. A survey of definitions of scientific models t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Sign Systems Studies Vol. 46; no. 1; pp. 7 - 44
Autor principal: Nöth, Winfried
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Tartu 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129514326&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 129514326
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14064243
        DSW
      jtl: Sign Systems Studies
      issn: 14064243
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2018
      vid: 46
      iid: 1
      pid: 25096
      pub: University of Tartu
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129514326
        10.12697/SSS.2018.46.1.01
      ppf: 7
      ppct: 37
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 2.5MB
      tig:
        atl: The semiotics of models.
      aug:
        au: Nöth, Winfried
        affil: Programa de Estudos Pós-Graduados em, Tecnologias da Inteligência e Design Digital, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Rua Caio Prado, 102 - Consolação, CEP 01303-000 São Paulo, Brazil
      su:
        Semiotics
        Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914
        Discourse analysis
        Philosophy of science
      sug:
        subj:
          Semiotics
          Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839-1914
          Discourse analysis
          Philosophy of science
      keyword:
        C. S. Peirce
        diagram
        icon
        legisign
        metaphor
        model
        token
        type
      ab:
        The paper sheds light on the concept of model in ordinary language and in scientific discourse from the perspective of C. S. Peirce's semiotics. It proposes a general Peircean framework for the definition of models of all kinds, including mental models. A survey of definitions of scientific models that have been influential in the philosophy of science and of the typologies proposed in this context is given. The author criticizes the heterogeneity of the criteria applied in these typologies and the lack of a semiotic foundation in typological distinctions between formal, symbolic, theoretical, metaphorical, and iconic models, among others. The paper argues that the application of Peirce's subdivision of signs into the trichotomies of the sign itself, its object, and its interpretant can offer a deeper understanding of the nature of models. Semiotic topics in the focus of the paper are (1) the distinction between models as signs and (mental) models as the interpretants of signs; (2) models considered as a type (or legisign) and models considered as tokens (or replicas) of a type; (3) the iconicity of models, including diagrammatic and metaphorical icons; (4) the contribution of indices and symbols to the informativity of models; and (5) the rhetorical qualities of models in scientific discourse. The paper argues in conclusion that informative models are hybrid signs in which a diagram incorporates indices and symbols in a rhetorically efficient way.
        Artikkel valgustab mudeli mõistet tavakeeles ja teadusdiskursuses C. S. Peirce'i semiootika perspektiivist lähtudes. Pakutakse välja Peirce'ilik üldraamistus mudelite, sealhulgas mentaalsete mudelite, defineerimiseks. Antakse ülevaade teaduslike mudelite definitsioonidest, mis on olnud mõjukad teadusfilosoofias, ja selles kontekstis esitatud tüpoloogiatest. Autor kritiseerib neis tüpoloogiates rakendatavate kriteeriumide heterogeensust ning semiootilise baasi puudumist tüpoloogilistes eristuses, sh formaalsete, sümboolsete, teoreetilistе, metafoorsete ja ikooniliste mudelite vahel. Artiklis väidetakse, et Peirce'i kolmetise märgiliigenduse (märgiks eneseks, selle objektiks ja tõlgendiks) rakendamine võib viia mudelite olemuse sügavamale mõistmisele. Semiootilised teemad, millele artiklis keskendutakse on (1) mudelite kui märkide ja (mentaalsete) mudelite kui märkide tõlgendite eristamine; (2) mudelid, mida peetakse tüübiks (või reegelmärgiks) ja mudelid, mida peetakse tüübi tookeniteks või koopiateks; (3) mudelite, sealhulgas diagrammatiliste ja metafoorsete ikoonide, ikoonilisus; (4) indeksite ja sümbolite panus mudelite informatiivsusesse; ja (5) mudelite retoorilised omadused teadusdiskursuses. Kokkuvõtes väidetakse artiklis, et informatiivsed mudelid on hübriidmärgid, milles diagramm hõlmab indekseid ja sümboleid retooriliselt tõhusal moel.
        B ctatье oпиcыbaеtcя пohяtие moдели b hayчhomm диckypcе b пеpcпеktиbе cе m иotиkи Пиpca и пpедлaгaеtcя ochoba для oпpеделеhия paзhыx tипob moделей (bkлючaя mеhtaль- hые). Abtop kpиtиkyеt hеoдhopoдhoctь kpиtеpиеb, пpиmеhяеmыx b cyщеctbyю щиx tипoлo гияx moделей, и otcytctbие cеmиotичеckoй бaзы b tипoлoги чеckиx paзличеhияx mеждy фopmaльhыmи, cиmboличеckиmи, tеopеtичеckиmи, mеtaфopичеckи mи, иkohи- чеckиmи и дp. Moделяmи. Ytbеpждaеtcя, чto пpиmеhеhие пиpcobckoгo пohиmahия зhaka kak tpиaды (cam зhak, егo oбъеkt и иhtеpпpеtaht) moжеt cпocoбctbobatь бoлее глyбokomy пohиmahию cyщhoctи moделей. B цеhtpе paccyждеhия --cледyющие cеmиotи - чеckие tеmы: (1) paзличеhие moделей kak зhakob и (mеhtaльhыx) moделей kak иhtеp- пpеtahtob; (2) moдели kak tипы и moдели kak tokеhы (или pеплиkи); (3) иkohичhoctь moделей, b tom чиcле диaгpammatичеckиx и mеtaфopичеckиx иkohob; (4) bkлaд иhдеkcob и cиmboлob b иhфopmatиbhoctь moделей и (5) pиtopичеckие kaчеctba moделей b hayчhom диckypcе. B зakлючеhии ytbеpждaеtcя, чto иhфopmatиbhые moдели яbляюtcя гибpидhыmи зhakamи, b kotopыx диaгpamma bkлючaеt b cебя иhдеkcы и cиmboлы pиto- pичеckи эффеktиbhыm oбpaзom.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Sign Systems Studies is the property of University of Tartu and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Sign Systems Studies
      holder: University of Tartu
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N