Cover Image
QR Code

Embedded Written Documents as Colonial Mimicry in Ezra-Nehemiah
.

The unity of the final form of Ezra-Nehemiah has long been the consensus position among scholars in the field. This article challenges that consensus by comparing and contrasting the use of embedded written documents in Ezra 7 and Nehemiah 10 through the theoretical lens of colonial mimicry. I argue...

Full description

Published in:Biblical Interpretation Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 158 - 182
Main Author: Jones, Christopher M.
Format: Article
Published: Brill Academic Publishers 2018
Subjects:
Bible. Nehemiah
Bible. Ezra
Scholars
Babylon (Extinct city)
Egypt
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129573044&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 129573044
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09272569
        C1F
      jtl: Biblical Interpretation
      issn: 09272569
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2018
      vid: 26
      iid: 2
      pid: 639
      pub: Brill Academic Publishers
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129573044
        10.1163/15685152-00262P02
      ppf: 158
      ppct: 24
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 351KB
      tig:
        atl: Embedded Written Documents as Colonial Mimicry in Ezra-Nehemiah
.
      aug:
        au: Jones, Christopher M.
        affil: Washburn University, USA

      su:
        Bible. Nehemiah
        Bible. Ezra
        Scholars
        Babylon (Extinct city)
        Egypt
      sug:
        subj:
          Egypt
          Bible. Nehemiah
          Bible. Ezra
          Scholars
          Babylon (Extinct city)
      keyword:
        Achaemenid Empire
        colonial mimicry
        Ezra-Nehemiah
        Homi K. Bhabha
        Persian Period

        postcolonialism
      ab: The unity of the final form of Ezra-Nehemiah has long been the consensus position among scholars in the field. This article challenges that consensus by comparing and contrasting the use of embedded written documents in Ezra 7 and Nehemiah 10 through the theoretical lens of colonial mimicry. I argue that the Artaxerxes rescript in Ezra 7 strategically mimics imperial discourse by assuming that propagandistic Persian rhetoric to Babylon and Egypt should also naturally apply to Yehud despite its peripheral status. By contrast, Nehemiah 10 invokes indigenous Judean writing to challenge the legitimacy of imperial domination. The sharply differing political programs articulated by these two texts, combined with literary and manuscript evidence from antiquity, suggests that the canonical book of Ezra-Nehemiah is an outlier among ancient Judean texts in juxtaposing the figures of Ezra and Nehemiah.

      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of Biblical Interpretation is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: Biblical Interpretation
      holder: Brill Academic Publishers
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N