Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.

Purpose: To conduct a systematic review on measurement properties of questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.Methods: A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE, EMbase and PsycINFO was performed. Full text, original articles, published in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Quality of Life Research Vol. 27; no. 6; pp. 1415 - 1431
Autores principales: van Dijk, Susan E. M., Adriaanse, Marcel C., van der Zwaan, Lennart, Bosmans, Judith E., van Marwijk, Harm W. J., van Tulder, Maurits W., Terwee, Caroline B.
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129610724&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 129610724
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09629343
        GPQ
      jtl: Quality of Life Research
      issn: 09629343
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2018
      vid: 27
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129610724
        129610724
        NLM29396653
        129610724
        10.1007/s11136-018-1782-y
        NLM29396653
        129610724
      ppf: 1415
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Measurement properties of depression questionnaires in patients with diabetes: a systematic review.
      aug:
        au:
          van Dijk, Susan E. M.
          Adriaanse, Marcel C.
          van der Zwaan, Lennart
          Bosmans, Judith E.
          van Marwijk, Harm W. J.
          van Tulder, Maurits W.
          Terwee, Caroline B.
        affil: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
      sug:
        subj:
          Diabetes Mellitus Complications
          Depression Diagnosis
          Questionnaires Evaluation
          Psychometrics Evaluation
          Human
          Adult
          Systematic Review
          Medline
          Embase
          Psycinfo
          Checklists Utilization
          Questionnaires Utilization
          Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale
          Psychological Tests
          Measurement Issues and Assessments
          Adult: 19-44 years
      ab: Purpose: To conduct a systematic review on measurement properties of questionnaires measuring depressive symptoms in adult patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.Methods: A systematic review of the literature in MEDLINE, EMbase and PsycINFO was performed. Full text, original articles, published in any language up to October 2016 were included. Eligibility for inclusion was independently assessed by three reviewers who worked in pairs. Methodological quality of the studies was evaluated by two independent reviewers using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist. Quality of the questionnaires was rated per measurement property, based on the number and quality of the included studies and the reported results.Results: Of 6286 unique hits, 21 studies met our criteria evaluating nine different questionnaires in multiple settings and languages. The methodological quality of the included studies was variable for the different measurement properties: 9/15 studies scored 'good' or 'excellent' on internal consistency, 2/5 on reliability, 0/1 on content validity, 10/10 on structural validity, 8/11 on hypothesis testing, 1/5 on cross-cultural validity, and 4/9 on criterion validity. For the CES-D, there was strong evidence for good internal consistency, structural validity, and construct validity; moderate evidence for good criterion validity; and limited evidence for good cross-cultural validity. The PHQ-9 and WHO-5 also performed well on several measurement properties. However, the evidence for structural validity of the PHQ-9 was inconclusive. The WHO-5 was less extensively researched and originally not developed to measure depression.Conclusion: Currently, the CES-D is best supported for measuring depressive symptoms in diabetes patients.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N