Regarding the 'Hole Argument'.
I argue that the hole argument is based on a misleading use of the mathematical formalism of general relativity. If one is attentive to mathematical practice, I will argue, the hole argument is blocked.
| Publicado en: | British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 329 - 351 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
University of Chicago Press
Jun2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129643285&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 129643285 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00070882 BPL jtl: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science issn: 00070882 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jun2018 vid: 69 iid: 2 pid: 415 pub: University of Chicago Press artinfo: ui: 129643285 10.1093/bjps/axw012 ppf: 329 ppct: 22 formats: tig: atl: Regarding the 'Hole Argument'. aug: au: Weatherall, James Owen affil: Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science University of California Irvine, CA USA su: General relativity (Physics) Philosophy of mathematics Spacetime Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955 Mathematical equivalence sug: subj: General relativity (Physics) Philosophy of mathematics Spacetime Einstein, Albert, 1879-1955 Mathematical equivalence ab: I argue that the hole argument is based on a misleading use of the mathematical formalism of general relativity. If one is attentive to mathematical practice, I will argue, the hole argument is blocked. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|