On the Existence of Spacetime Structure.

I examine the debate between substantivalists and relationalists about the ontological character of spacetime and conclude it is not well posed. I argue that the hole argument does not bear on the debate, because it provides no clear criterion to distinguish the positions. I propose two such precise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:British Journal for the Philosophy of Science Vol. 69; no. 2; pp. 447 - 484
Autor principal: Curiel, Erik
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: University of Chicago Press Jun2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=129643287&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 129643287
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00070882
        BPL
      jtl: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
      issn: 00070882
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2018
      vid: 69
      iid: 2
      pid: 415
      pub: University of Chicago Press
    artinfo:
      ui:
        129643287
        10.1093/bjps/axw014
      ppf: 447
      ppct: 37
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: On the Existence of Spacetime Structure.
      aug:
        au: Curiel, Erik
        affil: Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitä t Munich, Germany
      su:
        Existence theorems
        Spacetime
        Manifolds (Mathematics)
        Realism
        Instrumentalism (Philosophy)
      sug:
        subj:
          Existence theorems
          Spacetime
          Manifolds (Mathematics)
          Realism
          Instrumentalism (Philosophy)
      ab: I examine the debate between substantivalists and relationalists about the ontological character of spacetime and conclude it is not well posed. I argue that the hole argument does not bear on the debate, because it provides no clear criterion to distinguish the positions. I propose two such precise criteria and construct separate arguments based on each to yield contrary conclusions, one supportive of something like relationalism and the other of something like substantivalism. The lesson is that one must fix an investigative context in order to make such criteria precise, but different investigative contexts yield inconsistent results. I examine questions of existence about spacetime structures other than the spacetime manifold itself to argue that it is more fruitful to focus on pragmatic issues of physicality, a notion that lends itself to several different explications, all of philosophical interest, none privileged a priori over any of the others. I conclude by suggesting an extension of the lessons of my arguments to the broader debate between realists and instrumentalists.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N