A demonstration of how to do a meta-analysis that combines single-case designs with between-groups experiments: The effects of choice making on challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities.
Objective: This paper demonstrates how to conduct a meta-analysis that includes both between-group and single-case design (SCD) studies. The example studies whether choice-making interventions decrease challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities. Methods: We used a between-case d-sta...
| Publicado en: | Developmental Neurorehabilitation Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 266 - 279 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
May2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=129811858&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 129811858 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17518423 2Y75 jtl: Developmental Neurorehabilitation issn: 17518423 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: May2018 vid: 21 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 129811858 129811858 129811858 10.3109/17518423.2015.1100690 129811858 ppf: 266 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: A demonstration of how to do a meta-analysis that combines single-case designs with between-groups experiments: The effects of choice making on challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities. aug: au: Zelinsky, Nicole A. M. Shadish, William affil: Department Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, Humanities and Arts, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, USA sug: subj: Persons with Disabilities Psychosocial Factors Decision Making Behavioral Symptoms Human Meta Analysis Effect Size Sensitivity and Specificity Publication Bias Confidence Intervals Descriptive Statistics ab: Objective: This paper demonstrates how to conduct a meta-analysis that includes both between-group and single-case design (SCD) studies. The example studies whether choice-making interventions decrease challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities. Methods: We used a between-case d-statistic to conduct a meta-analysis of 15 between-group and SCD studies of 70 people with a disability, who received a choice intervention or control. We used robust variance estimation to adjust for dependencies caused by multiple effect sizes per study, and conducted moderator, sensitivity, influence, and publication bias analyses. Results: The random-effects average was d = 1.02 (standard error of 0.168), so the 95% confidence interval (CI) suggests choice-making reduces challenging behaviors by 0.65 to 1.38 standard deviations. Studies that provided choice training produced a significantly larger intervention effect. Conclusion: Choice-making reduces challenging behaviors performed by people with disabilities. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: meta analysis research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|