The Preoperative Microbial Detection is No Prerequisite for the Indication of Septic Revision in Cases of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection.

Aim of This Study. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) require a special antimicrobial regimen, fundamentally different from an aseptic treatment, making a correct preoperative diagnosis essential. However, a successful preoperative microbe detection is not always possible. We wanted to find out...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:BioMed Research International Vol. 2018; pp. 1 - 8
Autores principales: Karczewski, Daniel, Winkler, Tobias, Perka, Carsten, Müller, Michael
Formato: algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell 6/21/2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=130304824&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 130304824
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        23146133
        FT2T
      jtl: BioMed Research International
      issn: 23146133
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 6/21/2018
      vid: 2018
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        130304824
        130304824
        130304824
        10.1155/2018/1729605
        130304824
      ppf: 1
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: The Preoperative Microbial Detection is No Prerequisite for the Indication of Septic Revision in Cases of Suspected Periprosthetic Joint Infection.
      aug:
        au:
          Karczewski, Daniel
          Winkler, Tobias
          Perka, Carsten
          Müller, Michael
        affil: Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Charité-University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Joint Prosthesis
          Prosthesis-Related Infections Microbiology
          Disease Susceptibility
          Sepsis Diagnosis
          Preoperative Care
          Prosthesis-Related Infections Diagnosis
          Prosthesis-Related Infections Surgery
          Human
          C-Reactive Protein Blood
          Prosthesis Failure Radiography
          X-Rays
          Leukocytes
          Arthrocentesis
          Hip Surgery
          Knee Surgery
          Fistula
          Granulocytes
          Algorithms
          Intraoperative Period
          Recurrence
          Microbiologic Phenomena
          Precision
          Pain
          Fever
          Inflammation
      ab: Aim of This Study. Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) require a special antimicrobial regimen, fundamentally different from an aseptic treatment, making a correct preoperative diagnosis essential. However, a successful preoperative microbe detection is not always possible. We wanted to find out (1) if a preoperative microbe detection is a prerequisite before starting a septic revision in suspected PJIs or if the preoperative diagnosis can solely be based on (para)clinical signs (persistent CRP >1 mg/dl, early X-ray loosening signs in the first 5 years, leucocytes joint aspiration >1700/µl, conspicuous history, and clinical signs like redness, pain, hyperthermia, swelling, and loss of function); (2) if patients with and without preoperative microbe detection have a different outcome; and (3) if the microbial growth is the most important criterion of a multifactorial PJI definition. Methods. We included all first-line two-stage hip (49) and knee (47) revisions, performed in our department from 06/2013 on, with an available 2-year follow-up. A PJI was defined as one of the following four criteria: fistula or purulence, Krenn Morawietz type 2 or 3, joint aspirate > 2000/μl leukocytes or >70% granulocytes, and microbial growth. This multifactorial PJI definition was based on the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS). The standardized diagnostic algorithm is described in detail. Results. (1) 24 hip and 16 knee cases were treated without preoperative microbe detection solely on the basis of a (para)clinical diagnosis (see above). In the hip 91.6% (22 of 24 cases) showed an intraoperative microbe detection. In the knee, in 68.7% (11 of 16 cases) a microbe was detected intraoperatively and in 93.7% (15 of 16) at least one secure PJI criterion could be confirmed intraoperatively. (2) No statistical significant (p .517) difference between patients with (n = 56, reinfection rate 8.9%) and without (n = 40, 15%) preoperative microbe detection was found in a 2-year follow-up. (3) Microbial growth remains the overall (pre- and intraoperatively) most important criterion (hip 95.9%; knee 89.3%), followed by Krenn Morawietz for the intraoperative diagnosis (hip 67.3%, knee 48.9%), and joint aspiration for the knee and fistula for the hip, respectively, as preoperative criteria. Conclusion. High rates of intraoperatively fulfilled EBJIS PJI criteria show that a preoperative microbe detection is not necessary before intervening in suspected PJIs. The indication for a septic revision can solely be based on (para)clinical signs. The new established diagnostic algorithm based on a multifactorial PJI definition showed high precision in finding PJIs.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        algorithm
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N