Shared decision‐making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis.
Aim: The concept of shared decision‐making is poorly defined and often used interchangeably with related terms. The aim of this study was to delineate and clarify the concept of shared decision‐making in the paediatric field. Method: Rodgers and Knafl's evolutionary concept analysis was used to deli...
| Publicado en: | Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences Vol. 32; no. 2; pp. 478 - 490 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Jun2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=130361880&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 130361880 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02839318 BD4 jtl: Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences issn: 02839318 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jun2018 vid: 32 iid: 2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 130361880 130361880 130361880 10.1111/scs.12496 130361880 ppf: 478 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Shared decision‐making in the paediatric field: a literature review and concept analysis. aug: au: Park, Eun Sook Cho, In Young affil: College of Nursing, Korea University, Seoul, South Korea sug: subj: Decision Making, Shared In Infancy and Childhood Pediatric Care Professional Practice, Evidence-Based Concept Analysis Child Health Systematic Review Human CINAHL Database PubMed Medline Collaboration Parents Empowerment Health Status Infant, Newborn Infant Child, Preschool Child Adolescence Patient Autonomy Communication Professional-Patient Relations Professional-Family Relations Decision Making, Family Pediatric Nursing Nursing Role Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month Infant: 1-23 months Child, Preschool: 2-5 years Child: 6-12 years Adolescent: 13-18 years ab: Aim: The concept of shared decision‐making is poorly defined and often used interchangeably with related terms. The aim of this study was to delineate and clarify the concept of shared decision‐making in the paediatric field. Method: Rodgers and Knafl's evolutionary concept analysis was used to delineate and clarify the concept. Following a search of the CINAHL, PubMed and MEDLINE databases and online journals between 1995 and 2016, we included a total of 42 articles that referred to shared decision‐making in the paediatric field. Results: The attributes included active participation of the three: parents, children and health professionals; collaborative partnership; reaching a compromise; and common goal for child's health. Antecedents were existing several options with different possible outcomes; substantial decisional conflict; recognising child's health situations that decision‐making is needed; and willingness to participate in decision‐making. Finally, the consequences included decreased decisional conflict; mutual empowerment; improved child health status; and improved quality of paediatric health care. Conclusion: This study provides a theoretical understanding of the concept of shared decision‐making in the paediatric field; furthermore, by integrating this concept into paediatric practice, it may help to reduce the gap between theory and practice. The analysis could also provide nursing researchers with insight into paediatric decision‐making and establish a foundation to develop future interventions and situation‐specific theory for promoting high‐quality decision‐making in the paediatric field. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|