Selection of the Most Accurate Thermometer Devices for Clinical Practice: Part 1: Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Non-Core Thermometer Devices Compared to Core Body Temperature.

The literature is inconclusive on the accuracy of various thermometer devices used in clinical practice. We conducted a meta-analysis on the accuracy of temperatures from six peripheral (non-core) thermometer devices compared to core body temperature. Medline, CINAHL, and other resources were search...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pediatric Nursing Vol. 44; no. 3; pp. 116 - 134
Main Authors: Ryan-Wenger, Nancy A., Sims, Maureen A., Patton, Rebecca A., Williamson, Jayme
Format: meta analysis research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Jannetti Publications, Inc. May/Jun2018
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=130397364&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 130397364
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00979805
        21Z
      jtl: Pediatric Nursing
      issn: 00979805
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: May/Jun2018
      vid: 44
      iid: 3
      pid: 4135
      pub: Jannetti Publications, Inc.
      place: Pitman, New Jersey
    artinfo:
      ui:
        130397364
        130397364
        130397364
        130397364
      ppf: 116
      ppct: 18
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Selection of the Most Accurate Thermometer Devices for Clinical Practice: Part 1: Meta-Analysis of the Accuracy of Non-Core Thermometer Devices Compared to Core Body Temperature.
      aug:
        au:
          Ryan-Wenger, Nancy A.
          Sims, Maureen A.
          Patton, Rebecca A.
          Williamson, Jayme
        affil: Nurse Scientist, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH
      sug:
        subj:
          Body Temperature Determination
          Body Temperature
          Thermometers
          Validity
          Core Body Temperature
          Systematic Review
          Meta Analysis
          Human
          Medline
          CINAHL Database
          Cochrane Library
          Intrarater Reliability
          Interrater Reliability
          Confidence Intervals
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          kappa Statistic
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Paired T-Tests
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Chi Square Test
          P-Value
          Descriptive Statistics
          Tympanic Body Temperature
          Axillary Body Temperature
          Oral Body Temperature
          Rectal Body Temperature
      ab: The literature is inconclusive on the accuracy of various thermometer devices used in clinical practice. We conducted a meta-analysis on the accuracy of temperatures from six peripheral (non-core) thermometer devices compared to core body temperature. Medline, CINAHL, and other resources were searched for articles related to body temperature and thermometer devices. From 197 articles, 159 were research and 38 were non-research. Thirty-four research articles met criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis: core and non-core temperatures measured concurrently or sequentially, appropriate statistics, and sample size of 10 or more. We applied Cochrane GRADE criteria for diagnostic tests and strategies. Assessments of bias, indirectness of evidence, overall confidence in effect sizes, consistency, precision, and publication bias indicated low risk. The extent of heterogeneity was Q=0% for each type of thermometer device; impact of heterogeneity was 0% due to true differences, and I 2=100% due to random sampling error. Forest plots illustrated bias (mean differences), 95% confidence limits, and confidence intervals (CI). A forest plot of the overall accuracy of non-core devices indicated that oral and rectal electronic thermometers had the least bias (-0.05°C and -0.04°C) and nar- rowest CI: oral=0.58°C, rectal=1.18°C, compared to temporal (1.88°C), axillary chemical (2.25°C), axillary electronic (2.36°C), and tympanic (2.62°C). Our findings indicate that only oral and rectal electronic thermometer devices should be used to measure temperature of individuals for screening, monitoring, diagnostic, and treatment decisions. Tympanic, temporal, axillary chemical, and axillary electronic thermometer devices should not be used in clinical practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N