Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs.
In three simulation investigations, we examined the statistical properties of several different randomization-test procedures for analyzing the data from single-case multiple-baseline intervention studies. Two procedures (Wampold-Worsham and Revusky) are associated with single fixed intervention sta...
| Publicado en: | Developmental Neurorehabilitation Vol. 21; no. 5; pp. 290 - 312 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | computer program equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=130504201&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 130504201 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 17518423 2Y75 jtl: Developmental Neurorehabilitation issn: 17518423 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Jul2018 vid: 21 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 130504201 130504201 130504201 10.1080/17518423.2016.1197708 130504201 ppf: 290 ppct: 22 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparison of randomization-test procedures for single-case multiple-baseline designs. aug: au: Levin, Joel R. Ferron, John M. Gafurov, Boris S. affil: Department of Educational Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA sug: subj: Data Analysis, Statistical Methods Random Assignment Human Probability Bias (Research) ab: In three simulation investigations, we examined the statistical properties of several different randomization-test procedures for analyzing the data from single-case multiple-baseline intervention studies. Two procedures (Wampold-Worsham and Revusky) are associated with single fixed intervention start points and three are associated with randomly determined intervention start points. Of the latter three, one (Koehler-Levin) is an existing procedure that has been previously examined and the other two (modified Revusky and restricted Marascuilo-Busk) are modifications and extensions of existing procedures. All five procedures were found to maintain their Type I error probabilities at acceptable levels. In most of the conditions investigated here, two of the random start-point procedures (Koehler-Levin and restricted Marascuilo-Busk) were more powerful than the others with respect to detecting immediate abrupt intervention effects. For designs in which it is not possible to include the same series lengths for all cases, either the modified Revusky or restricted Marascuilo-Busk procedure is recommended. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: computer program equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|