Decision‐makers are resilient in the face of social exclusion.
A growing body of evidence suggests that social exclusion impairs people's capacity for active deliberation and logical reasoning. Building on this finding and on the postulate from the dual‐process theory that analytical thinking is essential in order to make good judgements and decisions, we hypot...
| Publicado en: | British Journal of Psychology Vol. 109; no. 3; pp. 604 - 631 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Aug2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=130505146&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 130505146 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00071269 BJP jtl: British Journal of Psychology issn: 00071269 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2018 vid: 109 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 130505146 10.1111/bjop.12294 ppf: 604 ppct: 27 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 293KB tig: atl: Decision‐makers are resilient in the face of social exclusion. aug: au: Juanchich, Marie Sirota, Miroslav Walasek, Lukasz affil: Department of Psychology, University of Essex, Colchester, UK Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK su: Games & psychology Confidence Decision making Judgment (Psychology) Psychological tests Social isolation Labeling theory Task performance Critical thinking Psychological resilience sug: subj: Games & psychology Confidence Decision making Judgment (Psychology) Psychological tests Social isolation Labeling theory Task performance Doll, Toy, and Game Manufacturing Toy and Hobby Goods and Supplies Merchant Wholesalers Hobby, Toy, and Game Stores Critical thinking Psychological resilience keyword: cognitive impairment decision‐making performance deliberation social exclusion cognitive impairment decision‐making performance deliberation social exclusion ab: A growing body of evidence suggests that social exclusion impairs people's capacity for active deliberation and logical reasoning. Building on this finding and on the postulate from the dual‐process theory that analytical thinking is essential in order to make good judgements and decisions, we hypothesized that social exclusion will alter judgement and choice behaviour. We tested this hypothesis in three experiments in which social exclusion was manipulated using the Cyberball paradigm, an online ball‐tossing game in which participants either received the ball a fair number of times or were excluded by the other two players. We focused on a range of tasks designed to be sensitive to participants’ ability to engage in analytical thinking and careful deliberation, including the cognitive reflection test (Experiment 1) and a set of anchoring, intertemporal preference, disjunction, and confidence tasks (experiments 2 and 3). Our results unanimously failed to support the hypothesis that social exclusion influences people's judgements and decision‐making. We discuss the implications of our findings for social exclusion theory. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|