Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.

Objective: To evaluate diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and magnetisation transfer imaging (MTI) compared to standard MRI for prostate cancer assessment in a re-biopsy population.Methods: Thirty-patients were imaged at 3 T including DKI (Kapp and Dapp) with b-values 150/450/800/1150/1500 s/mm2 and M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:European Radiology Vol. 28; no. 8; pp. 3141 - 3151
Autores principales: Barrett, Tristan, McLean, Mary, Priest, Andrew N., Lawrence, Edward M., Patterson, Andrew J., Koo, Brendan C., Patterson, Ilse, Warren, Anne Y., Doble, Andrew, Gnanapragasam, Vincent J., Kastner, Christof, Gallagher, Ferdia A.
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=130553004&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 130553004
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09387994
        NPH
      jtl: European Radiology
      issn: 09387994
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2018
      vid: 28
      iid: 8
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        130553004
        130553004
        NLM29222677
        130553004
        10.1007/s00330-017-5169-1
        NLM29222677
        130553004
      ppf: 3141
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
      aug:
        au:
          Barrett, Tristan
          McLean, Mary
          Priest, Andrew N.
          Lawrence, Edward M.
          Patterson, Andrew J.
          Koo, Brendan C.
          Patterson, Ilse
          Warren, Anne Y.
          Doble, Andrew
          Gnanapragasam, Vincent J.
          Kastner, Christof
          Gallagher, Ferdia A.
        affil: Department of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Prostatic Neoplasms Pathology
          ROC Curve
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging Methods
          Prospective Studies
          Repeat Procedures
          Male
          Middle Age
          Human
          Image Interpretation, Computer Assisted Methods
          Aged
          Biopsy Methods
          Validation Studies
          Comparative Studies
          Evaluation Research
          Multicenter Studies
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Male
      ab: Objective: To evaluate diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and magnetisation transfer imaging (MTI) compared to standard MRI for prostate cancer assessment in a re-biopsy population.Methods: Thirty-patients were imaged at 3 T including DKI (Kapp and Dapp) with b-values 150/450/800/1150/1500 s/mm2 and MTI performed with and without MT saturation. Patients underwent transperineal biopsy based on prospectively defined MRI targets. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the parameters and Wilcoxon-signed ranked test assessed relationships between metrics.Results: Twenty patients had ≥ 1 core positive for cancer in a total of 26 MRI targets (Gleason 3+3 in 8, 3+4 in 12, ≥ 4+3 in 6): 13 peripheral (PZ) and 13 transition zone (TZ). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and Dapp were significantly lower and the Kapp and MT ratio (MTR) significantly higher in tumour versus benign tissue (all p ≤ 0.005); ROC values 0.767-1.000. Normal TZ had: lower ADC and Dapp and higher Kapp and MTR compared to normal PZ. MTR showed a moderate correlation to Kapp (r = 0.570) and Dapp (r = -0.537) in normal tissue but a poor correlation in tumours. No parameter separated low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from high-grade (≥ 3+4) disease for either PZ (p = 0.414-0.825) or TZ (p = 0.148-0.825).Conclusion: ADC, Dapp, Kapp and MTR all distinguished benign tissue from tumour, but none reliably differentiated low- from high-grade disease.Key Points: • MTR was significantly higher in PZ and TZ tumours versus normal tissue • K app was significantly lower and D app higher for PZ and TZ tumours • There was no incremental value for DKI/MTI over mono-exponential ADC parameters • No parameter could consistently differentiate low-grade (Gleason 3+3) from high-grade (≥ 3+4) disease • Divergent MTR/DKI values in TZ tumours suggests they offer different functional information.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N