Should Internet Researchers Use Ill-Gotten Information?

This paper describes how the ethical problems raised by scientific data obtained through harmful and immoral conduct (which, following Stan Godlovitch, is called ill-gotten information) may also emerge in cases where data is collected from the Internet. It describes the major arguments for and again...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Science & Engineering Ethics Vol. 24; no. 4; pp. 1221 - 1241
Autor principal: Douglas, David M.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Aug2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=131259656&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 131259656
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13533452
        GNI
      jtl: Science & Engineering Ethics
      issn: 13533452
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2018
      vid: 24
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        131259656
        10.1007/s11948-017-9935-x
      ppf: 1221
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 464KB
      tig:
        atl: Should Internet Researchers Use Ill-Gotten Information?
      aug:
        au: Douglas, David M.
        affil: Brisbane, Australia
      su:
        Internet research
        Research ethics
        Scientific computing
        Research methodology
        Information theory
        Ethics
      sug:
        subj:
          Internet research
          Research ethics
          Scientific computing
          Research methodology
          Information theory
          Ethics
      keyword:
        Data ethics
        Ill-gotten information
        Internet Census 2012
        Internet research methods
      ab: This paper describes how the ethical problems raised by scientific data obtained through harmful and immoral conduct (which, following Stan Godlovitch, is called ill-gotten information) may also emerge in cases where data is collected from the Internet. It describes the major arguments for and against using ill-gotten information in research, and shows how they may be applied to research that either collects information about the Internet itself or which uses data from questionable or unknown sources on the Internet. Three examples (the Internet Census 2012, the PharmaLeaks study, and research into keylogger dropzones) demonstrate how researchers address the ethical issues raised by the sources of data that they use and how the existing arguments concerning the use of ill-gotten information apply to Internet research. The problems faced by researchers who collect or use data from the Internet are shown to be the same problems faced by researchers in other fields who may obtain or use ill-gotten information.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Science & Engineering Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2018. All Rights Reserved.
      item: Science & Engineering Ethics
      holder: Springer Nature
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N