Feasibility of the Less Is More Approach in Treating Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Ten-Year Review of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Upgraded to Invasion at Surgery.

Context.--Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of screen-detected breast cancers. The likelihood that certain types of DCIS are slow growing and may never progress to invasion suggests that our current standards of treating DCIS could result in overtreatment. The LORIS (LOw RISk DCIS) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine Vol. 142; no. 9; pp. 1120 - 1127
Autores principales: Podoll, Mirna B., Reisenbichler, Emily S., Roland, Lania, Bruner, Andrew, Mizuguchi, Sarah, Sanders, Mary Ann G.
Formato: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: College of American Pathologists Sep2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=131492914&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 131492914
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00039985
        1FS
      jtl: Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
      issn: 00039985
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2018
      vid: 142
      iid: 9
      pid: 2550
      pub: College of American Pathologists
      place: Northfield, Illinois
    artinfo:
      ui:
        131492914
        131492914
        131492914
        10.5858/arpa.2017-0268-OA
        131492914
      ppf: 1120
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Feasibility of the Less Is More Approach in Treating Low-Risk Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Diagnosed on Core Needle Biopsy: Ten-Year Review of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Upgraded to Invasion at Surgery.
      aug:
        au:
          Podoll, Mirna B.
          Reisenbichler, Emily S.
          Roland, Lania
          Bruner, Andrew
          Mizuguchi, Sarah
          Sanders, Mary Ann G.
        affil: Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
      sug:
        subj:
          Biopsy, Needle Methods
          Carcinoma, Ductal Diagnosis
          Carcinoma, Ductal Risk Factors
          Carcinoma, Ductal Surgery
          Neoplasm Invasiveness
          Disease Surveillance
          Treatment Outcomes
          Retrospective Design
          Human
          Lymph Nodes
          Neoplasm Grading
          Carcinoma, Ductal Pathology
          Patient Safety
          Disease Management
      ab: Context.--Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) represents 20% of screen-detected breast cancers. The likelihood that certain types of DCIS are slow growing and may never progress to invasion suggests that our current standards of treating DCIS could result in overtreatment. The LORIS (LOw RISk DCIS) and LORD (LOw Risk DCIS) trials address these concerns by randomizing patients with low-risk DCIS to either active surveillance or conventional treatment. Objective.--To determine the upgrade rate of DCIS diagnosed on core needle biopsy to invasive carcinoma at surgery and to evaluate the safety of managing low-risk DCIS with surveillance alone, by characterizing the pathologic and clinical features of upgraded cases and applying criteria of the LORD and LORIS trials to these cases. Design.--A 10-year retrospective analysis of DCIS on core needle biopsy with subsequent surgery. Results.--We identified 1271 cases of DCIS on core needle biopsy: 200 (16%) low grade, 649 (51%) intermediate grade, and 422 (33%) high grade. Of the 1271 cases, we found an 8% upgrade rate to invasive carcinoma (n ¼ 105). Nineteen of the 105 upgraded cases (18%) had positive lymph nodes. Low-grade DCIS was least likely to upgrade to invasion, comprising 10% (10 of 105) of upgraded cases. Three of the 105 upgraded cases (3%) met criteria for the LORD trial, and all were low-grade DCIS on core needle biopsy with favorable biology on follow-up. Conclusions.--There is a clear risk of upgrade to invasion on follow-up excision; however, applying strict criteria of the LORD trial effectively decreases the likelihood of a missed invasive component or missed aggressive pathologic features.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N