Individualization, inequality, and labor: a qualitative approach.

In this paper, we show how we came to explore Beck’s theory of individualization in the light of a qualitative study of livelihood strategies in post-2008 Spain and Cyprus. We observed that experiences of downward social mobility in contexts of welfare retreat and precarious labor conditions were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Dialectical Anthropology Vol. 42; no. 3; pp. 277 - 292
Autores principales: Lobato, Marta M., Molina, José Luis, Valenzuela-García, Hugo
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Springer Nature Sep2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=131517860&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 131517860
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03044092
        5H9
      jtl: Dialectical Anthropology
      issn: 03044092
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2018
      vid: 42
      iid: 3
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
    artinfo:
      ui:
        131517860
        10.1007/s10624-018-9512-y
      ppf: 277
      ppct: 15
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Individualization, inequality, and labor: a qualitative approach.
      aug:
        au:
          Lobato, Marta M.
          Molina, José Luis
          Valenzuela-García, Hugo
        affil: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
      su:
        Labor
        Sociology
        Beck, Ulrich, 1944-2015
      sug:
        subj:
          Labor
          Sociology
          Beck, Ulrich, 1944-2015
      keyword:
        Crisis
        Individualization
        Livelihood strategies
      ab: In this paper, we show how we came to explore Beck’s theory of individualization in the light of a qualitative study of livelihood strategies in post-2008 Spain and Cyprus. We observed that experiences of downward social mobility in contexts of welfare retreat and precarious labor conditions were compelling people to build marketed individualities and to create individual biographies with recourse to a highly individualized rhetoric. However, analysis of a very diverse sample of subjects from different socio-economic backgrounds showed us that individualization theory must be conceptualized within a framework of social structures, and that Beck’s individualization theory fails to recognize its persistence in contemporary societies. We therefore propose looking at individualization as a contemporary process through which class differences are expressed. Only in this way can it serve as a useful theoretical tool with which to understand the workings of contemporary capitalism and the ways in which new values and moral frameworks are being formed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N