CALLING FOR A PRACTICE TURN IN GLOBAL HISTORY: PRACTICES AS DRIVERS OF GLOBALIZATION/S.

ABSTRACT: Ever since the spatial turn, historians have faced major challenges regarding how to write and research global history in general and the history of globalization in particular. The four major challenges analyzed in this article are (1) the challenge of polyphony, (2) how to determine the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:History & Theory Vol. 57; no. 3; pp. 390 - 408
Autor principal: EPPLE, A. N. G. E. L. I. K. A.
Formato: Artículo
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Sep2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=131600368&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: hlh
    uiTerm: 131600368
    longDbName: Humanities International Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00182656
        HAT
      jtl: History & Theory
      issn: 00182656
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Sep2018
      vid: 57
      iid: 3
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
    artinfo:
      ui:
        131600368
        10.1111/hith.12071
      ppf: 390
      ppct: 18
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
              size: 361KB
      tig:
        atl: CALLING FOR A PRACTICE TURN IN GLOBAL HISTORY: PRACTICES AS DRIVERS OF GLOBALIZATION/S.
      aug:
        au: EPPLE, A. N. G. E. L. I. K. A.
        affil: Bielefeld University
      su:
        History of globalization
        World history
        Actor-network theory
        Practice theory (Social sciences)
        Glocalization
        Microhistory
      sug:
        subj:
          History of globalization
          World history
          Actor-network theory
          Practice theory (Social sciences)
          Glocalization
          Microhistory
      keyword:
        entanglements
        globalizations
        glocalization
        pluralization
        practice theory
        relational history
      ab: ABSTRACT: Ever since the spatial turn, historians have faced major challenges regarding how to write and research global history in general and the history of globalization in particular. The four major challenges analyzed in this article are (1) the challenge of polyphony, (2) how to determine the subject of global history beyond geographical definitions, (3) the dynamic of homo‐ and heterogenization accompanying the term “globalization/s,” and (4) how to grasp the relation between the micro level of individual actions and the macro level of global structures. The challenge of polyphony stems from the growing awareness of how Eurocentric perspectives have far too long obscured academic history‐writing with inappropriate presuppositions. The same goes for other (unreflected) area‐centrisms. A biased narrative for only one voice has to make way for a polyphonic narrative that meets the requirements of an up‐to‐date global history. Accordingly, this article suggests that neither geographically defined units nor the relation between given entities should be at the center of global history. Indeed, global history should deal with the “relationing” and the “making of” entities—one of which turns out to be “the global.” This article then proposes using the term “globalization” in the plural, but also reflects on its dependence on the singular. Closely connected to the pluralization of globalizing processes is the challenge of bridging convincingly between the micro level of individual actions and the macro level of global structures without disavowing the contingency and the heterogeneity of the individual. Several theories, such as practice theory and actor–network theory, can be used and modified to address these challenges, especially in determining the relation between macro‐ and microdynamics. I argue that practice theory offers one possible solution to these four challenges by combining both the heterogeneity of the micro level and the comprehensive narrative of global changes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: Y
      custom: Copyright of History & Theory is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.
      item: History & Theory
      holder: Wiley-Blackwell
      dt:
        @attributes:
          year: 2018
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N