Applications of machine learning algorithms to predict therapeutic outcomes in depression: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Background: No previous study has comprehensively reviewed the application of machine learning algorithms in mood disorders populations. Herein, we qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate previous studies of machine learning-devised models that predict therapeutic outcomes in mood disorders popula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Affective Disorders Vol. 241; pp. 519 - 533
Autores principales: Lee, Yena, Ragguett, Renee-Marie, Mansur, Rodrigo B., Boutilier, Justin J., Rosenblat, Joshua D., Trevizol, Alisson, Brietzke, Elisa, Lin, Kangguang, Pan, Zihang, Subramaniapillai, Mehala, Chan, Timothy C.Y., Fus, Dominika, Park, Caroline, Musial, Natalie, Zuckerman, Hannah, Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung, Ho, Roger, Rong, Carola, McIntyre, Roger S.
Formato: meta analysis research systematic review Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Dec2018
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=131628403&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 131628403
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01650327
        3M9
      jtl: Journal of Affective Disorders
      issn: 01650327
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2018
      vid: 241
      pid: 1004
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
    artinfo:
      ui:
        131628403
        131628403
        NLM30153635
        131628403
        10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.073
        NLM30153635
        131628403
      ppf: 519
      ppct: 14
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Applications of machine learning algorithms to predict therapeutic outcomes in depression: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
      aug:
        au:
          Lee, Yena
          Ragguett, Renee-Marie
          Mansur, Rodrigo B.
          Boutilier, Justin J.
          Rosenblat, Joshua D.
          Trevizol, Alisson
          Brietzke, Elisa
          Lin, Kangguang
          Pan, Zihang
          Subramaniapillai, Mehala
          Chan, Timothy C.Y.
          Fus, Dominika
          Park, Caroline
          Musial, Natalie
          Zuckerman, Hannah
          Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
          Ho, Roger
          Rong, Carola
          McIntyre, Roger S.
        affil: Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Diagnosis, Computer Assisted
          Algorithms
          Antidepressive Agents Therapeutic Use
          Depression Drug Therapy
          Human
          Female
          Neuroradiography
          Retrospective Design
          Adult
          Depression Diagnosis
          Male
          Treatment Outcomes
          Meta Analysis
          Systematic Review
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: No previous study has comprehensively reviewed the application of machine learning algorithms in mood disorders populations. Herein, we qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate previous studies of machine learning-devised models that predict therapeutic outcomes in mood disorders populations.Methods: We searched Ovid MEDLINE/PubMed from inception to February 8, 2018 for relevant studies that included adults with bipolar or unipolar depression; assessed therapeutic outcomes with a pharmacological, neuromodulatory, or manual-based psychotherapeutic intervention for depression; applied a machine learning algorithm; and reported predictors of therapeutic response. A random-effects meta-analysis of proportions and meta-regression analyses were conducted.Results: We identified 639 records: 75 full-text publications were assessed for eligibility; 26 studies (n=17,499) and 20 studies (n=6325) were included in qualitative and quantitative review, respectively. Classification algorithms were able to predict therapeutic outcomes with an overall accuracy of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] of [0.77, 0.87]). Pooled estimates of classification accuracy were significantly greater (p < 0.01) in models informed by multiple data types (e.g., composite of phenomenological patient features and neuroimaging or peripheral gene expression data; pooled proportion [95% CI] = 0.93[0.86, 0.97]) when compared to models with lower-dimension data types (pooledproportion=0.68[0.62,0.74]to0.85[0.81,0.88]).Limitations: Most studies were retrospective; differences in machine learning algorithms and their implementation (e.g., cross-validation, hyperparameter tuning); cannot infer importance of individual variables fed into learning algorithm.Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms provide a powerful conceptual and analytic framework capable of integrating multiple data types and sources. An integrative approach may more effectively model neurobiological components as functional modules of pathophysiology embedded within the complex, social dynamics that influence the phenomenology of mental disorders.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        meta analysis
        research
        systematic review
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N