The relentless link between neighbourhoods and segregation: what are the alternatives?

There is a long-standing critique about neighbourhoods: that whether they are planned, delineated or self-actualised, they often exist for the purpose of social segregation. An important question for planners is whether neighbourhoods can embody progressive ideals and not devolve into enclaves promo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:TPR: Town Planning Review Vol. 89; no. 5; pp. 443 - 463
Main Author: Talen, Emily
Format: Article
Published: Liverpool University Press / Journals 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=131776784&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ssf
    uiTerm: 131776784
    longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson)
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00410020
        3GB
      jtl: TPR: Town Planning Review
      issn: 00410020
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2018
      vid: 89
      iid: 5
      pid: 39786
      pub: Liverpool University Press / Journals
    artinfo:
      ui:
        131776784
        10.3828/tpr.2018.29
      ppf: 443
      ppct: 20
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
            size: 1.1MB
      tig:
        atl: The relentless link between neighbourhoods and segregation: what are the alternatives?
      aug:
        au: Talen, Emily
        affil: Professor of Urbanism at the University of Chicago, Division of Social Sciences, 1126 E 59th St, Chicago, IL 60637
      su:
        Neighborhoods
        Segregation
        Minorities
        Race relations
        Race discrimination
      sug:
        subj:
          Neighborhoods
          Segregation
          Minorities
          Race relations
          Race discrimination
      keyword:
        mixed-income housing
        neighbourhoods
        segregation
        social diversity
        mixed-income housing
        neighbourhoods
        segregation
        social diversity
      ab: There is a long-standing critique about neighbourhoods: that whether they are planned, delineated or self-actualised, they often exist for the purpose of social segregation. An important question for planners is whether neighbourhoods can embody progressive ideals and not devolve into enclaves promoting social insularity and separation. This paper reviews the three main strategies that have been proposed over the past century: (1) to look for ways to successfully integrate the segregated neighbourhood into a wider urban system; (2) to position ethnic neighbourhoods as a legitimate example of successful segregation, if there is external connectivity and economic diversity within; and (3) to make neighbourhood- scale social diversity an explicit policy goal, accomplished through housing mix and other spatial planning policies. Each of these alternatives to the neighbourhood-as-segregation narrative has been advanced, with partial success. I conclude that neighbourhood segregation remains a serious issue that needs to be addressed, but that neighbourhoods themselves remain an important element of urban life - and planning practice. Both to sustain the neighbourhood ideal and mitigate its segregationist tendencies, planners need to try to improve upon, and potentially integrate, all three of the alternatives that have been developed.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Article
      src: R
    language: English
    refInfo:
    copyright:
      @attributes:
        flag: N
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N