Including and Excluding Indigenous Religion through Law.
Across the world, indigenous peoples enjoy unprecedented access to international, regional, and domestic legal remedies to gain protections for their religious, spiritual, and customary identities, beliefs, and practices through a wide spectrum of judicial platforms. These remedies provide a broad,...
| Publicado en: | Numen: International Review for the History of Religions Vol. 65; no. 5/6; pp. 531 - 562 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=131820940&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 131820940 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00295973 C4J jtl: Numen: International Review for the History of Religions issn: 00295973 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: 2018 vid: 65 iid: 5/6 pid: 639 pub: Brill Academic Publishers artinfo: ui: 131820940 10.1163/15685276-12341511 ppf: 531 ppct: 31 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 544KB tig: atl: Including and Excluding Indigenous Religion through Law. aug: au: Årsheim, Helge affil: University of Oslo su: Human rights Religious law & legislation Indigenous ethnic identity Kutenai (North American people) Canada. Supreme Court Canada sug: subj: Canada Human rights Religious law & legislation Indigenous ethnic identity Kutenai (North American people) Canada. Supreme Court keyword: human rights indigeneity Jovsset Ánte Iversen Sara Ktunaxa law Norway religion Sami ab: Across the world, indigenous peoples enjoy unprecedented access to international, regional, and domestic legal remedies to gain protections for their religious, spiritual, and customary identities, beliefs, and practices through a wide spectrum of judicial platforms. These remedies provide a broad, inclusive, and “intersectional” vocabulary for indigenous peoples to formulate their rights claims. Despite the growing interest in research on law and religion and the recognition that international human rights law is vital to the formulation of indigenous rights claims, the nature, scope, and effects of the proliferation of international norms protecting “indigenous religion” has so far not been subject to extensive research. Seeking to address this lacuna in the literature, this article explores the extent to which indigenous peoples involved in two recent Supreme Court decisions in Canada and Norway have chosen to rely on the available vocabulary for the formulation of rights claims related to “indigenous religion.” pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Numen: International Review for the History of Religions is the property of Brill Academic Publishers and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Numen: International Review for the History of Religions holder: Brill Academic Publishers dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|