Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings.
Abstract: The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scien...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Community Psychology Vol. 62; no. 1/2; pp. 189 - 203 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Sep2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ssf&AN=131861847&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ssf uiTerm: 131861847 longDbName: Social Sciences Full Text (H.W. Wilson) uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 00910562 CMP jtl: American Journal of Community Psychology issn: 00910562 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Sep2018 vid: 62 iid: 1/2 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell artinfo: ui: 131861847 10.1002/ajcp.12258 ppf: 189 ppct: 14 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 128KB tig: atl: Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings. aug: au: McKay, Virginia R. Proctor, Enola K. Morshed, Alexandra B. Brownson, Ross C. Prusaczyk, Beth affil: Center for Public Health Systems Science, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA Institute of Clinical and Translational Science, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA Center for Mental Health Services Research, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA Institute for Public Health, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA Prevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA Department of Surgery (Division of Public Health Sciences) and Alvin J. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA Center for Clinical Quality and Implementation Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA su: Intervention (Social services) Implementation (Social action programs) Public health Information dissemination Narratives sug: subj: Intervention (Social services) Implementation (Social action programs) Public health Information dissemination Health and Welfare Funds Narratives keyword: De‐implementation Implementation science Social service Theory De‐implementation Implementation science Social service Theory ab: Abstract: The discontinuation of interventions that should be stopped, or de‐implementation, has emerged as a novel line of inquiry within dissemination and implementation science. As this area grows in human services research, like public health and social work, theory is needed to help guide scientific endeavors. Given the infancy of de‐implementation, this conceptual narrative provides a definition and criteria for determining if an intervention should be de‐implemented. We identify three criteria for identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation: (a) interventions that are not effective or harmful, (b) interventions that are not the most effective or efficient to provide, and (c) interventions that are no longer necessary. Detailed, well‐documented examples illustrate each of the criteria. We describe de‐implementation frameworks, but also demonstrate how other existing implementation frameworks might be applied to de‐implementation research as a supplement. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of de‐implementation in the context of other stages of implementation, like sustainability and adoption; next steps for de‐implementation research, especially identifying interventions appropriate for de‐implementation in a systematic manner; and highlight special ethical considerations to advance the field of de‐implementation research. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: N holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|