“Racist Propaganda”: discursive Negotiations on YouTube of Perceived Anti-White Racism in South Korea.
This article analyzes YouTube comments about a Munhwa Broadcasting Company report that White “expatriates” in South Korea called xenophobic and racist. The research is important because there is a paucity of scholarship on White discourse outside the West and because there is limited work on YouTube...
| Publicado en: | Atlantic Journal of Communication Vol. 26; no. 5; pp. 306 - 318 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Artículo |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Nov/Dec2018
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=132135226&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: hlh uiTerm: 132135226 longDbName: Humanities International Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: jinfo: jid: 15456870 U8J jtl: Atlantic Journal of Communication issn: 15456870 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Nov/Dec2018 vid: 26 iid: 5 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd artinfo: ui: 132135226 10.1080/15456870.2018.1517767 ppf: 306 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P size: 899KB tig: atl: “Racist Propaganda”: discursive Negotiations on YouTube of Perceived Anti-White Racism in South Korea. aug: au: Oh, David Chison affil: Communication Arts, Ramapo College of New Jersey, Mahwah, New Jersey Fulbright Scholar, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, South Korea su: Racism Propaganda YouTube (Web resource) Discourse analysis South Korea sug: subj: South Korea Racism Propaganda YouTube (Web resource) Discourse analysis ab: This article analyzes YouTube comments about a Munhwa Broadcasting Company report that White “expatriates” in South Korea called xenophobic and racist. The research is important because there is a paucity of scholarship on White discourse outside the West and because there is limited work on YouTube as a space to articulate and negotiate discourses about racism. This is despite the increasingly complex flows of people and discourse around the globe. In this article, I argue that YouTube acted as a site of ideological negotiation in which Orientalist discourses were advanced under the cover of color-blind racism. Many of the YouTube comments framed Korea as xenophobic and racist, and even for self-identified White commenters sympathetic to the report, they did not challenge the construction of Korea as racist or the normative belief in postracism. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: Article src: R language: English refInfo: copyright: @attributes: flag: Y custom: Copyright of Atlantic Journal of Communication is the property of Taylor & Francis Ltd and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites without the copyright holder's express written permission. Additionally, content may not be used with any artificial intelligence tools or machine learning technologies. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. item: Atlantic Journal of Communication holder: Taylor & Francis Ltd dt: @attributes: year: 2018 holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|