Selection of an Electronic Health Record System for a Community-based Integrative Oncology Center.
Objective: This case report describes an integrative oncology center's selection of an electronic health record system. The goal is to provide a process framework for community integrative cancer care centers engaging in the selection of an oncology-focused system. Methods: A core team of experts fr...
| Publicado en: | Perspectives in Health Information Management pp. 1 - 13 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Health Information Management Association
Fall2018
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=132180591&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 132180591 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15594122 2QEL jtl: Perspectives in Health Information Management issn: 15594122 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Fall2018 pid: 6825 pub: American Health Information Management Association place: Chicago, Illinois artinfo: ui: 132180591 132180591 132180591 132180591 ppf: 1 ppct: 12 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Selection of an Electronic Health Record System for a Community-based Integrative Oncology Center. aug: au: Stillwell, Molly Gowin, Krisstina Klimant, Eiko affil: Professional writer at Salish Cancer Center in Fife, WA sug: subj: Electronic Health Records Community Health Services Integrative Medicine Oncology Care Units Product Selection Criteria Human Algorithms Medical Informatics Funding Source ab: Objective: This case report describes an integrative oncology center's selection of an electronic health record system. The goal is to provide a process framework for community integrative cancer care centers engaging in the selection of an oncology-focused system. Methods: A core team of experts from the practice assessed needs, held formative meetings, identified a set of candidate vendors to present, and held summative assessment meetings to select the product. Results and Discussion: Of 13 vendors identified, four were excluded because of insufficient interoperability, program design, lack of training support, and minimal patient involvement. Six companies were eliminated because of usability standards. Three finalists were evaluated utilizing a bubble-sorting algorithm, and one vendor was selected. Conclusion: Electronic health record selection requires thoughtful integration of clinic and patient needs, service population, and the changing healthcare system. Future studies are needed to establish formal yet adaptable electronic health selection processes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|